Kiwi Heroes: John Britten and the Britten V1000

John Britten and the Britten V1000

The ingenuity of Kiwis has long been one of our strongest traits, making do with the tools and materials before us, we have learnt that something so simple as a dream is most definitely possible. History has shown this to be true from the likes of Burt Munroe with his Indian, Richard Pearse the pioneer aviator and Bruce McLaren, who as you should know, founded the McLaren F1 team.

From the iconic No.8 wire to the Bungee, amongst a smattering of Kiwis, legendary ideas have come to pass, one of those being born down in the South Island, with which I kick off with, the Britten V1000.

Born on the 1st of August in 1950, Christchurch, New Zealand. John quickly put his hand to work, showing an interest in motor vehicles at a very young age. Building his first motorised go-kart at the tender age of 12 and moving onto an old Indian Scout found in a ditch the next year.In 1968, John went on to undertake 4 years of a Mechanical Engineering course at a night school and from there, going on-wards and upwards, working on various projects and businesses.

BRITOP

In 1992, John founded the Britten Motorcycle Company, which at first, operated from his garage. Coming from small beginnings, the Britten Motorcycle Company would soon show the rest of the world what they were up against, and that a man with a dream is a force to be reckoned with.

John experimented with various materials, bikes and ideas before settling on his final design. He originally started with a bevel-drive Ducati race bike, but after being let down by both the motor and chassis, he fabricated his own custom frame and after trialing the NZ made Denco motors (which he also did back in 1986 with his Aero-D-One bike) he decided to produce his own engines.

Designing the engine from scratch, John came up with two engines for different classes, one being the V1000 and the other the V1100 which found it’s way into the Cardinal bike. John conceptualized the body work with No.8 wire and a hot glue gun around his home-made frame inside his garage at home, he then molded a woven carbon fibre fairing from his finished design into the body work that we all know and love today.

All up, the cost of the carbon fibre throughout the bike was around $2-300 worth, which is astonishing considering he built the entire bike out of it. The wheels, swing-arm and girder forks as well as the body, engine components and additional extras.

One of the problems John faced was that whilst carbon fibre is as light as a feather and hard as steel, it is extremely brittle and prone to crack when it is bolted onto other components. John’s solution to this was named the skin and bones method, which was to machine aluminium spools to serve as hard points. Carbon/Kevlar filaments were then wound around them under tension, he then went on to lay another layer of carbon fibre over top to finish it off.

The double wishbone forks were another interesting addition into the Britten, the only problem with those forks for motorcycle racing applications were that they could not be made light enough whilst still providing necessary stiffness with the conventional materials. John realized that carbon would be a perfect material to produce the forks which provided both strength and weight reduction among other benefits.

Though during testing of the bike 9 weeks before the Daytona race, the bike had a serious problem. The wishbone forks snapped under immense stress and injured rider Chris Haldane, snapping his collar bone. It was back to the workshop yet again to work on constructing an even stronger pair of forks in time for the ever closer Daytona Battle of the Twins.

The idea for the colour scheme of the Britten came from when John was away on holiday in Australia, he came back with a glass starfish with different shades of blue and violet, John told his mate Bob Brookland who works as a screen printer and who paints and restores motorcycles in his spare time that, that was how he wanted the Britten to be painted the next time, though true to tradition, the paint had to be specifically made to fit the requirements demanded by John.

The bike was completed with 3 days to spare before being shipped off to America to compete at the Daytona event, along with key crew members and then up and coming rider Andrew Stroud.

britten and stroud

Auckland born rider Andrew Stroud was 19 when he entered racing in New Zealand, competing first in the NZ 250 production class and winning his first championship in 1988, he then went on to place 2nd in the 1988 Arai 500 km Superbike race. Stroud also raced in the U.S. Endurance series and the Suzuka 8 hours.

During practice the Britten performed just as had been hoped and all was looking well until Stroud pulled into the pits and an water/fuel mix was found leaking from the bike. John and his team set to work on finding the fault in a nearby mechanics school and discovered the problem to be a cracked cylinder sleeve.

With no replacements available, they did the one thing that Kiwi’s do best, improvise. Tirelessly throughout the night, John and the team worked away at welding the cylinder sleeve crack, though without a clue on if it would work and no idea on how to best weld a cylinder sleeve so they made it up as they went.

The bike was put back together with a few hours to spare and after generating large media and fan interest, the bike and team were swamped with punters coming to look at this one of a kind motorcycle.

It was only Strouds’ second time on the Britten since it had been completed and his first time on the Daytona racetrack, though that didn’t stop the young gun from taking the leading position away from Ducati but with only 1 lap left, rainfall had halted the race till the track had dried out.

The race was restarted with Stroud in front, the bike tore ahead and the Ducati rider could not get past the almighty Britten, with only 2 laps to go, the bike started to lose power.

Ducati stole the lead and Andrew Stroud pulled into pit lane shortly after. The problem, one of the few parts not made by  Britten himself failed. The broken stator caused the battery to run flat just near the end of the race and what could have been a triumphant moment in motorcycle history for John, Stroud and the team, was dashed away with the failure of the stator.

All was not lost however, the Britten and Stroud caused a huge stir in the crowd and the media were heralding them as champions with a revolutionary new bike, stating that they looked forward to seeing them next year at the following Battle of the Twins event.

Stroud went on to win both Daytona races in 1994 on the Britten bike while setting the fastest top speed recorded by any motorcycle at Daytona (189 mph or 305 km/h). He also won the 96′,97′ and 98′ Battle of the Twins races on the mighty Britten.

But what the world realised that day is that it’s not only big corporations and factories that can produce cutting edge technology and revolutionary designs, but that the dream of one man can be used to achieve anything set before him.

A bike hand built and designed by a dyslexic Kiwi man in a Christchurch garage with over 6-7000 handmade parts, sporting technology never seen before, could compete against the best of the best, the major brand names with millions of dollars to spend on R&D, the creme de la creme.

And we not only showed that we could build the bike, we showed that we could win.

By Matt Wishart from http://nzblokes.co.nz
Posted in Historical, New Zealand, Photography, Social Commentary, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Lance Armstrong 0: Ivan Fernandez WON

Off the Top of My Head

By Paul Murray
 

True sportsmanship was shown recently by promising Spanish cross-country runner Iván Fernández Anaya, 24, in race in Burlada, Navarre, Spain on December 2, 2012.

Fernández Anaya was in second place to Kenyan runner Abel Mutai, who won the bronze medal in the 3,000-meter steeplechase at the 2012 London Olympics. Mutai had an insurmountable lead in the race, but stopped before the finish believing the he’d already crossed the line. Fernández Anaya could have passed him and won the race, but realised Mutai’s mistake and instead, accepted that he was the rightful winner and  helped the Kenyan over the actual finish line to victory.

This noble act of compassion, sportsmanship and honesty received almost no media attention, sadly, all sports news was focussed on Lance Armstrong’s fall from grace and subsequent confession to being a career dope cheat and liar.

Sportsmanship is not dead and the action of Fernández Anaya is a example of human compassion and everything that is positive about sport, competition and physical endeavour…a true sportsman concedes defeat graciously and then redoubles his efforts to improve. There is nothing sporting about winning unfairly.

However, Fernández Anaya’s coach, Martín Fiz, was less than impressed with his charge’s beneficent gesture, “I wouldn’t have done it myself. I certainly would have taken advantage of it to win,” He said.

Looks like Lance Armstrong may have found himself a new coach!

Man up Lance…you’re a cheat and a liar and you’ve let everyone, including yourself, down…have a look at Iván Fernández Anaya if you want a role model to guide your future.

181195_591022014247012_53116621_n

Posted in Education, Historical, Media, Money, Photography, Social Commentary, Sport, United States | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Insurance Companies…Who’s Watching These Crooks?

Off the Top of my Head

By Paul Murray

Incredibly, insurance premiums worldwide have skyrocketed in the wake of natural disasters and the prospect of more wild weather resulting from climate change and other factors…deforestation, fracking etc, etc.

The insurance premiums for my businesses have more than doubled in the past two years and I’m one of the lucky ones…word is that the insurance for Canterbury University has increased tenfold…from $1 million to $10 million.

OK, in the case of the South Island of New Zealand, we’ve had a rough time with the Christchurch Earthquake, but insurance companies should have had sufficient reserved to cover all contingencies, have spread their own risk through reinsurance…that is what they are supposed to do…they are insurance companies and have teams of actuaries working on risk calculation to ensure the insurers are able to honour their commitment to their customers.

However, it would seem that insurance companies, which have been joined at the hip with banks for the past 50 years, are hitting their customers up for sufficient money to cover their losses in a single year…and we are allowing this to happen by dutifully digging deep and paying the inflated premiums.

In the United States the situation was even worse. U.S. citizens were subjected to the “Too Big to Fail” scenario whereby huge insurers like AIG, which completely failed to meet its commitment to its customers, was bailed out to the tune of around $180 billion by the U.S. taxpayer.

But we don’t need to worry about that here in New Zealand right? Wrong…AIG is deeply involved in the N.Z. insurance industry, it is the nation’s largest general insurer…the company even sponsors the All Blacks!

Insurance companies have a responsibility to man up and take their losses like any other business and the fact that they are being allowed to outrageously inflate their premiums to cover their losses is a failing of our government who seem feeble in response to the power of these companies and their lobbyists who argue that the government needs to support their policies…policies that the government has been backing through the legal system for many years…if you operate a commercial business, you must have insurance, it’s the law.

But of course, once the coffers of the insurers have been replenished, they will reduce the premiums right? Mmmm…that would seem unlikely given that in the history of the world insurance premiums have never gone down, so we can expect insurance companies to be making uber-profits in the coming years…the only way to get your money back would be to purchase shares in insurance companies and further encourage the bastards!!

Climate change is said to be responsible for the extreme weather conditions we have been seeing in recent years. Deforestation, pollution, industry, reliance on fossil fuels etc are seen as contributing factors to climate change, but who is behind all this? Insurance companies invest heavily in such enterprises…and fracking, which some consider responsible for earthquakes…insurance companies have it locked down…create demand for their intangible product (…you don’t need insurance until your house burns down) by destroying the Earth, sell policies to people to prevent them from personal loss resulting from “natural disasters,” have government (taxpayer) back-up in the event the demand exceeds contingency funds and then a further safety cushion by being allowed to arbitrarily increase insurance premiums whenever necessary to recover losses…and we, the policyholders and voters allow this to happen by being apathetic and subservient…we desperately need political leadership in New Zealand (and elsewhere), we the people need to stand up and say ENOUGH!! and we need political leaders who will not roll over to corporate lobbyists and stand up for the rights of the people…how about it Johnki?

American International Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
American International Group, Inc.
AIG 2012 logo.png
Type Public
Traded as NYSEAIG
S&P 500 Component
Industry Insurance, Financial services
Founded Shanghai, China (1919)[1]
Founder(s) Cornelius Vander Starr
Headquarters 180 Maiden Lane, New York City,
New York, United States
Area served Worldwide
Key people Bob Benmosche
(President & CEO)
Steve Miller (Chairman)[2]
Products Insurance annuitiesmutual funds
Revenue Decrease US$ 64.237 billion (2011)[3]
Operating income Decrease US$ (1.065) billion (2011)[4]
Net income Increase US$ 17.798 billion (2011)[4]
Total assets Decrease US$ 655.773 billion (2011)[4]
Total equity Decrease US$ 105.806 billion (2011)[4]
Employees 57,000 (2011)[4]
Website AIG.com

American International Group, Inc. NYSEAIG, also known as AIG, is an American multinational insurance corporation. Its corporate headquarters is reported as 180 Maiden Lane in New York City (was formerly in the American International Building in New York City). The British headquarters office is on Fenchurch Street in London, continental Europe operations are based inLa Défense, Paris, and its Asian headquarters office is in Hong Kong. According to the 2011 Forbes Global 2000 list, AIG was the 29th-largest public company in the world.[5][6] It was listed on the Dow Jones Industrial Average from April 8, 2004 to September 22, 2008.

AIG suffered from a liquidity crisis when its credit ratings were downgraded below “AA” levels in September 2008. The United States Federal Reserve Bank on September 16, 2008 created an $85 billion credit facility to enable the company to meet increased collateral obligations consequent to the credit rating downgrade, in exchange for the issuance of a stock warrant to the Federal Reserve Bank for 79.9% of the equity of AIG. The Federal Reserve Bank and the United States Treasury by May 2009 had increased the potential financial support to AIG, with the support of an investment of as much as $70 billion, a $60 billion credit line and $52.5 billion to buy mortgage-based assets owned or guaranteed by AIG, increasing the total amount available to as much as $182.5 billion.[7][8] AIG subsequently sold a number of its subsidiaries and other assets to pay down loans received, and continues to seek buyers of its assets

History

The American International Building inLower Manhattan.

AIG history dates back to 1919, when Cornelius Vander Starr established an insurance agency in Shanghai, China. Starr was the first Westerner in Shanghai to sell insurance to the Chinese, which he continued to do until AIG left China in early 1949—as Mao Zedong led the advance of the Communist People’s Liberation Army on Shanghai.[9][10] Starr then moved the company headquarters to its current home in New York City.[11] The company went on to expand, often through subsidiaries, into other markets, including other parts of Asia, Latin America, Europe, and the Middle East.[12]

In 1962, Starr gave management of the company’s lagging U.S. holdings to Maurice R. “Hank” Greenberg, who shifted its focus from personal insurance to high-margin corporate coverage. Greenberg focused on selling insurance through independent brokers rather than agents to eliminate agent salaries. Using brokers, AIG could price insurance according to its potential return even if it suffered decreased sales of certain products for great lengths of time with very little extra expense. In 1968, Starr named Greenberg his successor. The company went public in 1969.[13]

Beginning in 2005, AIG became embroiled in a series of fraud investigations conducted by the Securities and Exchange CommissionU.S. Justice Department, and New York State Attorney General‘s Office. Greenberg was ousted amid an accounting scandal in February 2005; he is still fighting civil charges being pursued by New York state.[14][15][16] The New York Attorney General’s investigation led to a $1.6 billion fine for AIG and criminal charges for some of its executives.[17] Greenberg was succeeded as CEO by Martin J. Sullivan, who had begun his career at AIG as a clerk in its London office in 1970.[18]

AIG purchased the remaining 39% that it did not own of online auto insurance specialist 21st Century Insurance in 2007 for $749 million.[19] With the failure of the parent company and the continuing recession in late 2008, AIG rebranded its insurance unit to 21st Century Insurance.[20][21]

On June 15, 2008, after disclosure of financial losses and subsequent to a falling stock price, Sullivan resigned and was replaced by Robert B. Willumstad, Chairman of the AIG Board of Directors since 2006. Willumstad was forced by the US government to step down and was replaced by Edward M. Liddy on September 17, 2008.[22] AIG’s board of directors named Robert Benmosche CEO on August 3, 2009 to replace Mr. Liddy, who earlier in the year announced his retirement.[23]

Business

Holdings

In the United States, AIG is the largest underwriter of commercial and industrial insurance, and AIG acquired American General Life Insurance in August 2001.[24]

Financial crisis

Chronology of September 2008 liquidity crisis

On September 16, 2008, AIG suffered a liquidity crisis following the downgrade of its credit rating. Industry practice permits firms with the highest credit ratings to enterswaps without depositing collateral with their trading counter-parties. When its credit rating was downgraded, the company was required to post additional collateral with its trading counter-parties, and this led to an AIG liquidity crisis. AIG’s London unit sold credit protection in the form of credit default swaps (CDSs) on collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) that had by that time declined in value.[25] The United States Federal Reserve Bank announced the creation of a secured credit facility of up to US$85 billion, to prevent the company’s collapse by enabling AIG to meet its obligations to deliver additional collateral to its credit default swap trading partners. The credit facility provided a structure to loan as much as US$85 billion, secured by the stock in AIG-owned subsidiaries, in exchange for warrants for a 79.9% equity stake, and the right to suspend dividends to previously issued common and preferred stock.[18][26][27] AIG announced the same day that its board accepted the terms of the Federal Reserve Bank’s rescue package and secured credit facility.[28] This was the largest government bailout of a private company in U.S. history, though smaller than the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac a week earlier.[29][30]

AIG’s share prices had fallen over 95% to just $1.25 by September 16, 2008, from a 52-week high of $70.13.[citation needed] The company reported over $13.2 billion in losses in the first six months of the year.[31][32] The AIG Financial Products division headed by Joseph Cassano, in London, had entered into credit default swaps to insure $441 billion worth of securities originally rated AAA. Of those securities, $57.8 billion were structured debt securities backed by subprime loans.[33] CNN named Cassano as one of the “Ten Most Wanted: Culprits” of the 2008 financial collapse in the United States.[34]

As Lehman Brothers (the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history at that time) suffered a catastrophic decline in share price, investors began comparing the types of securities held by AIG and Lehman, and found that AIG had valued its Alt-A and sub-prime mortgage-backed securities at 1.7 to 2 times the values used by Lehman which weakened investors’ confidence in AIG.[31] On September 14, 2008, AIG announced it was considering selling its aircraft leasing division, International Lease Finance Corporation, to raise cash.[31] The Federal Reserve hired Morgan Stanley to determine if there are systemic risks to a financial failure of AIG, and asked private entities to supply short-term bridge loans to the company. In the meantime, New York regulators allowed AIG to borrow $20 billion from its subsidiaries.[35][36]

At the stock market‘s opening on September 16, 2008, AIG’s stock dropped 60 percent.[37] The Federal Reserve continued to meet that day with major Wall Street investment firms, hoping to broker a deal for a non-governmental $75 billion line of credit to the company.[38] Rating agencies Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s downgraded AIG’s credit ratings on concerns over likely continuing losses on mortgage-backed securities. The credit rating downgrade forced the company to deliver collateral of over $10 billion to certain creditors and CDS counter-parties.[39] The New York Times later reported that talks on Wall Street had broken down and AIG may file for bankruptcy protection on Wednesday, September 17.[40] Just before the bailout by the US Federal Reserve, AIG former CEO Maurice (Hank) Greenberg sent an impassioned letter to AIG CEO Robert B. Willumstad offering his assistance in any way possible, ccing the Board of Directors. His offer was rebuffed.[41]

Federal Reserve bailout

On the evening of September 16, 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank‘s Board of Governors announced that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York had been authorized to create a 24-month credit-liquidity facility from which AIG could draw up to $85 billion. The loan was collateralized by the assets of AIG, including its non-regulated subsidiaries and the stock of “substantially all” of its regulated subsidiaries, and with an interest rate of 850 basis points over the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) (i.e., LIBOR plus 8.5%). In exchange for the credit facility, the U.S. government received warrants for a 79.9 percent equity stake in AIG, with the right to suspend the payment of dividends to AIG common and preferred shareholders.[18][27] The credit facility was created under the auspices of Section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act.[27][42][43] AIG’s board of directors announced approval of the loan transaction in a press release the same day. The announcement did not comment on the issuance of a warrant for 79.9% of AIG’s equity, but the AIG 8-K filing of September 18, 2008, reporting the transaction to the Securities and Exchange Commission stated that a warrant for 79.9% of AIG shares had been issued to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve.[18][28][44] AIG drew down US$ 28 billion of the credit-liquidity facility on September 17, 2008.[45] On September 22, 2008, AIG was removed from the Dow Jones Industrial Average.[46] An additional $37.8 billion credit facility was established in October. As of October 24, AIG had drawn a total of $90.3 billion from the emergency loan, of a total $122.8 billion.[47]

Maurice Greenberg, former CEO of AIG, on September 17, 2008, characterized the bailout as a nationalization of AIG. He also stated that he was “bewildered” by the situation and was at a loss over how the entire situation got out of control as it did.[48] On September 17, 2008, Federal Reserve Board chair Ben Bernanke asked Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to join him, to call on members of Congress, to describe the need for a congressionally authorized bailout of the nation’s banking system. Weeks later, Congress approved the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. Bernanke said to Paulson on September 17, “We can’t keep doing this. Both because we at the Fed don’t have the necessary resources and for reasons of democratic legitimacy, it’s important that the Congress come in and take control of the situation.”[49]

Additional bailouts of 2008

From mid September till early November, AIG’s credit-default spreads were steadily rising, implying the company was heading for default.[50][51] On November 10, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced it would purchase $40 billion in newly issued AIG senior preferred stock, under the authority of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act‘sTroubled Asset Relief Program.[52][53][54] The FRBNY announced that it would modify the September 16 secured credit facility; the Treasury investment would permit a reduction in its size from $85 billion to $60 billion, and that the FRBNY would extend the life of the facility from three to five years, and change the interest rate from 8.5% plus the three-month London interbank offered rate (LIBOR) for the total credit facility, to 3% plus LIBOR for funds drawn down, and 0.75% plus LIBOR for funds not drawn, and that AIG would create two off- balance-sheet Limited Liability Companies (LLC) to hold AIG assets: one to act as an AIG Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Facility and the second to act as an AIG Collateralized Debt Obligations Facility.[52][54] Federal officials said the $40 billion investment would ultimately permit the government to reduce the total exposure to AIG to $112 billion from $152 billion.[52] On December 15, 2008, the Thomas More Law Center filed suit to challenge the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, alleging that it unconstitutionally promotes Islamic law (Sharia) and religion. The lawsuit was filed because AIG provides Takaful Insurance Plans, which, according to the company, avoid investments and transactions that are”un-Islamic”.[55][56]

As of January 2012, TARP had about $50 billion invested in AIG according to one report. Break even for the government was figured at $28.73 a share v. then-current share price of about $25.[57]

Counterparty controversy

AIG was required to post additional collateral with many creditors and counter-parties, touching off controversy when over $100 billion was paid out to major global financial institutions that had previously received TARP money. While this money was legally owed to the banks by AIG (under agreements made via credit default swaps purchased from AIG by the institutions), a number of Congressmen and media members expressed outrage that taxpayer money was going to these banks through AIG.[58] In January, 2010, a document known as “Schedule A – List of Derivative Transactions” was released to the public, against the wishes of the New York Fed. It listed many of the insurance deals that AIG had with various other parties, such as Goldman SachsSociété GénéraleDeutsche Bank, and Merrill Lynch.[59][60]

Had AIG been allowed to fail in a controlled manner through bankruptcy, bondholders and derivative counterparties (major banks) would have suffered significant losses, limiting the amount of taxpayer funds directly used. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke argued: “If a federal agency had [appropriate authority] on September 16, [2008], they could have been used to put AIG into conservatorship or receivership, unwind it slowly, protect policyholders, and impose haircuts on creditors and counterparties as appropriate. That outcome would have been far preferable to the situation we find ourselves in now.”[61]

Post-bailout expenditures

The week following the September bailout, AIG employees and distributors participated in a California retreat which cost $444,000 and featured spa treatments, banquets, and golf outings.[62][63]

It was reported that the trip was a reward for top-performing life-insurance agents planned before the bailout.[64] Less than 24 hours after the news of the party was first reported by the media, it was reported that the Federal Reserve had agreed to give AIG an additional loan of up to $37.8 billion.[65] AP reported on October 17 that AIG executives spent $86,000 on a previously scheduled English hunting trip. News of the lavish spending came just days after AIG received an additional $37.8 billion loan from the Federal Reserve, on top of a previous $85 billion emergency loan granted the month before. Regarding the hunting trip, the company responded, “We regret that this event was not canceled.”[66] An October 30, 2008 article from CNBC reported that AIG had already drawn upon $90 billion of the $123 billion allocated for loans.[67] On November 10, 2008, just a few days before renegotiating another bailout with the US Government for $40 billion, ABC News reported that AIG spent $343,000 on a trip to a lavish resort in Phoenix, Arizona[68]

Settlement of credit default swaps

On October 22, 2008, Lehman Brothers’ creditors who bought credit default swaps to hedge against a Lehman bankruptcy settled those accounts. The net payments were $5.2 billion[69] even though initial estimates of the amount of the settlement were between $100 billion and $400 billion.[70]

By December 2008, AIG had paid at least $18.7 billion to various financial institutions, including Goldman Sachs and Société Générale, to retire obligations related to credit default swaps (CDS). As much as $53.5 billion related to swap payouts are part of the bailout.[71]

On March 15, 2009, under mounting pressure from Congress and after consultation with the Federal Reserve, AIG disclosed a list of major recipients of collateral postings and payments under credit default swapsguaranteed investment agreements, and securities lending agreements.[72] Below is data from one of the charts AIG released, representing only a portion of the total payouts, over a period of a few months.

AIG collateral postings to credit default swap counterparties
from the period September 16, 2008 to December 31, 2008[73]
Counterparty US $ posted Counterparty US $ posted
Société Générale $4,100,000,000 Deutsche Bank $2,600,000,000
Goldman Sachs $2,500,000,000 Merrill Lynch $1,800,000,000
Calyon $1,100,000,000 Barclays $900,000,000
UBS $800,000,000 DZ Bank $700,000,000
Wachovia $700,000,000 Rabobank $500,000,000
KFW $500,000,000 JPMorgan $400,000,000
Banco Santander $300,000,000 Danske Bank $200,000,000
Reconstruction Finance Corporation[74] $200,000,000 HSBC Bank $200,000,000
Morgan Stanley $200,000,000 Bank of America $200,000,000
Bank of Montreal $200,000,000 Royal Bank of Scotland $200,000,000
Other (unknown) $4,100,000,000

[edit]Sales of assets

AIG since September 2008 has marketed its assets to pay off its government loans. A global decline in the valuation of insurance businesses, and the weakening financial condition of potential bidders, has challenged its efforts. If the U.S. government decides to continue to protect the company from falling into bankruptcy, it may have to take the assets itself in exchange for the loans, or offer further direct financial support.[75]

Munich Re bought machinery and equipment insurance company Hartford Steam Boiler in 2009.[76][77]

In April 2009 it was announced that AIG was selling the 21st Century Insurance subsidiary to Farmers Insurance Group for $1.9 billion.[78] The sale included AIG Hawaii.[79]

In June 2009, AIG sold down its majority ownership of reinsurer Transatlantic Re.[80]

As of September 6, 2009, The Wall Street Journal reported that Pacific Century Group had agreed to pay $500 million for a part of American International Group’s asset management business, and that they also expected to pay an additional $200 million to AIG in carried interest and other payments linked to future performance of the business.[81]

Also in 2009, AIG sold its operations in Colombia to Ecuador’s Banco del Pichincha.

On March 1, 2010, insurance company Prudential confirmed that it was in advanced negotiations to buy the Asian operations of AIG.[82] Prudential was to buy the pan-Asian life insurance company, American International Assurance (AIA), for approximately $35.5 billion.[83] On June 1, 2010 the deal failed because AIG would not accept the $30.5 billion after Prudential lowered the amount by $5 billion from the originally planned $35.5 billion after Prudential shareholder discontent.[84]

AIG agreed on March 8, 2010, to sell its American Life Insurance Co. unit (ALICO) to MetLife Inc. for $15.5 billion in cash and stock by November 1, 2010. Alico has annuities, life and health insurance operations in Japan, Middle East (including Nepal, Bangladesh and Pakistan), Western and Eastern Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean. AIG said it will sell Alico for $6.8 billion in cash and the remainder in MetLife equity. The deal leaves AIG as the second-largest shareholder of MetLife, with a stake of more than 20% in the company.

On March 29, 2010, Bloomberg L.P. reported that after almost three months of delays, AIG had completed the $500 million sale of a portion of its asset management business, branded PineBridge Investments, to the Asia-based Pacific Century Group.[85]

In August 2010, Fortress Investment Group purchased 80% of the interest in financing company American General Finance.[86]

On September 30, 2010, AIG announced an agreement to sell two of its life insurance companies in Japan, AIG Star and AIG Edison, to Prudential Financial for $4.2 billion in cash and $600 million in the assumption of third party debt to help repay some of the money owed to the U.S. government.[87]

On November 1, 2010, AIG announced it had raised $36.71 billion from the sale of ALICO and an initial public offering for AIA (which included Philamlife). The company will use the proceeds Federal Reserve Bank of New York credit facility and make payments on other interests owned by the government.[88]

AIG announced September 6, 2012, it was selling part of its stake, up to $2 billion dollars, in Asian insurer AIA Group Ltd. and plans to pay off more of its loans from the US government. The insurer’s board also approved the repurchase of up to $5 billion dollars of shares of its common stock from the US government.[89]

Record losses

On March 2, 2009, AIG reported a fourth quarter loss of $61.7bn (£43bn) and revenue of −$23.7bn (−£16.2bn) for the final three months of 2008. This was the largest quarterly loss in corporate history at that time.[90] The announcement of the loss had an impact on morning trading in Europe and Asia, with the FTSE100DAX and Nikkeiall suffering sharp falls. In the US the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell to below 7000 points, a twelve-year low.[91][92] The news of the loss came the day after the U.S. Treasury Department had confirmed that AIG was to get an additional $30 billion in aid, on top of the $150 billion it has already received.[93] The Treasury Department suggested that the potential losses to the US and global economy would be ‘extremely high’ if it were to collapse[94] and has suggested that if in future there is no improvement, it will invest more money into the company, as it is unwilling to allow it to fail.[95] The firm’s position as not just a domestic insurer, but also one for small businesses and many listed firms, has prompted US officials to suggest its demise could be ‘disastrous’ and the Federal Reserve said that AIG posed a ‘systemic risk’ to the global economy.[90] The fourth quarter result meant the company made a $99.29 billion loss for the whole of 2008,[94] with five consecutive quarters of losses costing the company well over $100 billion.[95] In a testimony before the Senate Budget Committee on March 3, 2009, the Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke stated that “AIG exploited a huge gap in the regulatory system,” … and “to nobody’s surprise, made irresponsible bets and took huge losses”.[96]

2009 employee bonus payments

In March 2009, AIG announced that they were paying $165 million in executive bonuses. Total bonuses for the financial unit could reach $450 million and bonuses for the entire company could reach $1.2 billion.[97] President Barack Obama, who voted for the AIG bailout as a Senator[98] responded to the planned payments by saying “[I]t’s hard to understand how derivative traders at AIG warranted any bonuses, much less $165 million in extra pay. How do they justify this outrage to the taxpayers who are keeping the company afloat?” and “In the last six months, AIG has received substantial sums from the U.S. Treasury. I’ve asked Secretary Geithner to use that leverage and pursue every legal avenue to block these bonuses and make the American taxpayers whole.”[99]

Protester outside 60 Wall StreetDeutsche Bank‘s US main office in the wake of the bonus controversy is interviewed by news media.

Politicians on both sides of the Congressional aisle reacted with outrage to the planned bonuses. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said “I would suggest the first thing that would make me feel a little bit better toward them if they’d follow the Japanese example and come before the American people and take that deep bow and say, I’m sorry, and then either do one of two things: resign or go commit suicide.”[100] Senator Chuck Schumer (D-New York) accused AIG of “Alice in Wonderland business practices” and said “It boggles the mind.” He has threatened to tax the bonuses at up to 100%.[101] Senator Richard Shelby (R-Alabama) said “These people brought this on themselves. Now you’re rewarding failure. A lot of these people should be fired, not awarded bonuses. This is horrible. It’s outrageous.”[102] Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) echoed his comments, saying “This is an outrage.”[103] Senator Jon Tester (D-Montana) said “This is ridiculous.” and AIG executives “need to understand that the only reason they even have a job is because of the taxpayers.”[104] Senator Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) said “I’ve had it.” and “The fact that they continue to do it while we pour in billions of dollars is indefensible.”[105] Representative Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts), Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said paying these bonuses would be “rewarding incompetence”[104] and “These people may have a right to their bonuses. They don’t have a right to their jobs forever.”[102]Representative Mark Kirk (R-Illinois) said “AIG should not be on welfare from Uncle Sam, and yet paying bonuses and transferring a considerable amount of taxpayer funds to entities overseas.”[105] Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said “It makes me angry. I slammed the phone more than a few times on discussing AIG.”[102] Lawrence Summers, Director of the National Economic Council, said “The easy thing would be to just say, you know, ‘Off with their heads,’ and violate the contracts, but you have to think about the consequences of breaking contracts for the overall system of law.”[106] Austan Goolsbee, of the Council of Economic Advisers said “I don’t know why they would follow a policy that’s really not sensible, is obviously going to ignite the ire of millions of people.” and “You worry about that backlash.”[107]

Political commentators and journalists expressed an equally bipartisan outrage.[100][108][109][110][110][111][112][113][114][115][116]

On March 24, 2009, The New York Times printed the resignation letter of Jake DeSantis, executive vice president of AIG’s financial products unit, to Edward M. Liddy, the chief executive of AIG. DeSantis stated he had nothing to do with the credit default swaps, he lost much of his life savings in the form of deferred compensation invested in the capital of AIG Financial Products; he had agreed to work for an annual salary of $1 out of a sense of duty, that he was assured many times the bonuses would be paid in March 2009, and that he believed he and others were let down by Liddy’s lack of support. He also stated he was going to donate his bonus to those suffering from the global economic downturn.[117]

It was reported that Senator Christopher Dodd (D-Con) (who first denied, then admitted to amending the legislation to allow the AIG bonuses), received $160,000 from employees of AIG.[118][119][120][121] A memo issued in 2006 by Joseph Cassano, AIG Financial Products chief executive, urged AIG employees to donate to Dodd, saying that as “next in line to become chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee… Senator Dodd will now have the opportunity to set the committee’s agenda on issues critical to the financial services industry.”[122]

Manchester United Sponsorship

AIG was the principal sponsor of English football club Manchester United from 2006–2010, and as part of the sponsorship deal, its logo was prominently displayed on the front of the club’s jerseys and other merchandise. The AIG deal was announced by Manchester United chief executive David Gill on April 6, 2006, for a British shirt sponsorship record £56.5 million, to be paid over four years (£14.1 million a year). The deal became the most valuable sponsorship deal in the world in September 2006, after the renegotiation and subsequent degrading of the £15 million-a-year deal Italian team Juventus had with oil firm Tamoil. During AIG’s sponsorship, Manchester United enjoyed one of its most successful periods in history, winning the Premier League three consecutive years, two Football League Cups, and the UEFA Champions League.[citation needed]

On January 21, 2009, it was announced that AIG would not be renewing its sponsorship of the club at the end of the deal in May 2010. It is not clear, however, whether or not AIG’s agreement to run MU Finance will continue. American risk consulting firm Aon Corporation was named the club’s new principal sponsor on June 3, 2009, with its sponsorship of the club taking effect from the beginning of the 2010–11 season. The terms of the deal were not revealed, but it has been reported to be worth approximately £80 million over four years.[123]

Share buyback

Due to the Q3 2011 net loss widened, so on November 3, 2011 the AIG shares has plunged 49 percent year to date. The insurer’s board has approved the share buyback of as much as $1 billion.[124]

[edit]Litigation

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed(September 2008)

In November 2004, AIG reached a US$126 million settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department partly resolving a number of regulatory matters, but the company must still cooperate with investigators continuing to probe the sale of a non-traditional insurance product.[125]

On June 11, 2008, three stockholders, collectively owning 4% of the outstanding stock of AIG, delivered a letter to the Board of Directors of AIG seeking to oust CEO Martin Sullivan and make certain other management and Board of Directors changes. This letter was the latest volley in what the Wall Street Journal deemed a “public spat” between the Company’s Board and management, on the one hand, and its key stockholders, and former CEO Maurice “Hank” Greenberg on the other hand.[126]

Circa 2010 the WSJ reported that a family sued AIG for alleged complicity in a ‘stranger-originated life insurance‘ scheme, whereby AIG managers allegedly welcomed people without an insurable interest to take out life insurance policies against others. The case involved JB Carlson and Germaine Tomlinson, and was one of many similar lawsuits in the US at the time.[127]

On 9 January 2013 AIG’s board discussed joining a lawsuit against the United States government because the bailout they received was unfair to their investors. [128]The idea was rejected.[129]

Accounting fraud claims

On October 14, 2004 the New York State Office of Attorney General Eliot Spitzer announced that it had commenced a civil action against Marsh & McLennan Companiesfor steering clients to preferred insurers with whom the company maintained lucrative payoff agreements, and for soliciting rigged bids for insurance contracts from the insurers. The Attorney General announced in a release that two AIG executives pleaded guilty to criminal charges in connection with this illegal course of conduct. In early May 2005, AIG restated its financial position and issued a reduction in book value of USD $2.7 billion, a 3.3 percent reduction in net worth.

On February 9, 2006, AIG and the New York State Attorney General’s office agreed to a settlement in which AIG would pay a fine of $1.6 billion.[130]

Corporate governance

Board of directors

  • Robert H. Benmosche – President and Chief Executive Officer, American International Group, Inc.
  • W. Don Cornwell – Former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Granite Broadcasting Corporation
  • John H. Fitzpatrick – Chairman, Oak Street Management Co., LLC
  • Laurette T. Koellner – Former Senior Vice President, The Boeing Company and Former President Boeing International
  • Donald H. Layton – Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, E*Trade Financial Corporation
  • Christopher S. Lynch – Former Partner, KPMG LLP
  • Arthur C. Martinez – Former Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, Sears, Roebuck and Co.
  • George L. Miles, Jr. – President and Chief Executive Officer, WQED Multimedia
  • Henry S. Miller – Chairman and Managing Director, Miller Buckfire & Co., LLC
  • Robert S. Miller – Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, American International Group, Inc.
  • Suzanne Nora Johnson – Former Vice Chairman, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
  • Morris W. Offit – Chairman, Offit Capital Advisors LLC
  • Ronald A. Rittenmeyer – Former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Electronic Data Systems Corporation
  • Douglas Steenland – Former President and Chief Executive Officer, Northwest Airlines Corporation

As of October 2011.[131]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ “AIG and China: Could A “Special Relationship” Translate into Cash?”TIME. September 18, 2008. Retrieved August 9, 2011.
  2. ^ BusinessInsurance, “‘Turnaround Kid’ Miller gets challenge at AIG”
  3. ^ {{cite web |url=http://www.aig.com/Chartis/internet/US/en/2011annualreport_tcm3171-440893.pdf Page 213}
  4. a b c d e “Form 10-K”. Retrieved February 26, 2010.
  5. ^ “The World’s Biggest Public Companies”ForbesArchived from the original on June 04 2011. Retrieved June 7, 2011.
  6. ^ “AIG”Forbes. Retrieved June 7, 2011.
  7. ^ Son, Hugh (May 13, 2009). “AIG’s Trustees Shun ‘Shadow Board,’ Seek Directors (Update2)”. Bloomberg. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  8. ^ “U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve Board Announce Participation in AIG Restructuring Plan” (Press release). Federal Reserve Board. Archived from the original on July 10, 2011. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  9. ^ Thompson, Clifford; Block, Maxine; Moritz, Charles; Rothe, Anna Herthe; Candee, Marjorie Dent (1941). Current Biography YearbookCurrent Biography (60th ed.).H. W. Wilson Company. p. 247. ISBN 0-8242-1042-5. Retrieved March 18, 2009.
  10. ^ “Foreign Office Files for China, 1949–1976”Part 1: Complete Files for 1949: Publisher’s Note. Adam Matthew Publications. Retrieved March 18, 2009.
  11. ^ “AIG: What does this US giant do?”. BBC News. September 17, 2008.Archived from the original on March 20, 2009. Retrieved March 18, 2009.
  12. ^ “American International Group Inc (New York Stock Exchange)”Company profile (New York: Thomson Reuters). Archived from the original on February 20, 2009. Retrieved March 18, 2009.
  13. ^ Hoover’s Handbook of American Business (9th ed.). Austin, TX: Hoover’s Business Press. 1999. p. 134. ISBN 978-1-57311-045-7. Retrieved March 18, 2009.
  14. ^ “MSNBC”. MSNBC. Archived from the original on June 28, 2011. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  15. ^ Zuill, Lilla (March 3, 2009). “Reuters”. Reuters. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  16. ^ “The Street.com”.
  17. ^ Yahoo[dead link]
  18. a b c d Andrews, Edmund L.; Michael J. de la Merced and Mary Williams Walsh (September 16, 2008). “Fed’s $85 billion Loan Rescues Insurer”New York times.Archived from the original on September 17, 2008. Retrieved September 17, 2008.
  19. ^ “AIG buys 21st Century Insurance”Los Angeles Times. September 28, 2007.
  20. ^ “AIG rebrand US auto insurance unit 21st Century Insurance, and cut jobs”. November 26, 2008. Retrieved Dec. 3, 2008.
  21. ^ “AIG renaming auto insurance division, cutting jobs”. November 26, 2008. Retrieved Dec. 3, 2008.
  22. ^ Zuill, Lilla (December 30, 2008). “Former AIG CEO Willumstad foregoes some stock awards”. New York: Thomson Reuters. Retrieved March 18, 2009.
  23. ^ Dennis, Brady (August 3, 2009). “The Washington Post, “AIG Names Robert Benmosche New President and CEO””The Washington Post. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  24. ^ “History of American General Life Companies”. AIGAG.com. Archived from the original on July 07 2011. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  25. ^ Gretchen, Morgenson (September 27, 2008). “Behind Insurer’s Crisis, Blind Eye to a Web of Risk”. NY Times. Archived from the original on September 29, 2008. Retrieved September 17, 2008.
  26. ^ Kaiser, Emily (September 17, 2008). “After AIG rescue, Fed may find more at its door”. Reuters. Archived from the original on September 20, 2008. Retrieved September 17, 2008.
  27. a b c United States Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Press release: Federal Reserve Board, met with full support of the Treasury Department, authorizes the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to lend up to $85 billion to the American International Group (AIG), September 16, 2008
  28. a b “AIG Statement on Announcement by Federal Reserve Board of $85 billion Secured Revolving Credit Facility: Addresses Liquidity Issues and Policyholder Concerns”. American International Group, Inc.. September 16, 2008. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  29. ^ Clobbered: Dow Plummets 449 on Credit Fears Fox Business News
  30. ^ “Adding to the Government’s Books”New York Times. September 18, 2008.Archived from the original on September 21, 2008. Retrieved September 18, 2008. (Graphic comparing size of government credit facilities or asset guarantees)
  31. a b c Gretchen Morgensen; Mary Williams Walsh (September 14, 2008). “Rush Is On to Prevent AIG From Failing”The New York TimesArchived from the original on September 15, 2008. Retrieved September 14, 2008.
  32. ^ Andrew Ross Sorkin (September 14, 2008). “AIG to Plan Restructuring and Asset Sales”The New York TimesArchived from the original on September 15, 2008. Retrieved September 14, 2008.
  33. ^ Mark Pittman (September 29, 2008). “Goldman, Merrill Collect Billions After Fed’s AIG Bailout Loans”. Bloomberg News. Retrieved October 12, 2008.
  34. ^ “Culprits of the Collapse – Joe Cassano”. Ac360.blogs.cnn.com. October 10, 2008. Archived from the original on July 16, 2011. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  35. ^ “Fed Seeks At Least $70 billion to Help AIG.”. The New York Times DealBook. September 15, 2008. Archived from the original on September 18, 2008. Retrieved September 15, 2008.
  36. ^ “Goldman, JPMorgan Try to Arrange $75 billion AIG Loan”. Bloomberg. September 15, 2008. Retrieved September 15, 2008.
  37. ^ Andrew Ross Sorkin (September 16, 2008). “AIG Plummets Again as Options Fade”The New York TimesArchived from the original on September 16, 2008. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  38. ^ Michael Grynbaum (September 16, 2008). “Wall Street Holds Steady; Fed to Meet”The New York TimesArchived from the original on February 22, 2009. Retrieved March 10, 2009.
  39. ^ “S&P: Ratings on American International Group Lowered and Kept on CreditWatch Negative”. Yahoo News. September 16, 2008. Retrieved April 10, 2009.[dead link]
  40. ^ Michael Merced; Eric Dash (September 16, 2008). “Industry Efforts to Rescue AIG Said to Falter”The New York TimesArchived from the original on September 19, 2008. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  41. ^ Many blame the financial problems on the legal problems AIG began having as a result of a number of government investigations alleging fraud and other inproprieties which were approved by the office of its then chairman, Maurice Greenberg. These problems placed such a focus on AIG’s activities that it created a level of required transparency and fear of getting caught, which many believe forced the company to be less active and willing to cheat its way out of these problems. A manner of doing business it learned with its core activity of denying legitimate insurance claims and then pressuring its insureds, their witnesses and anyone else coming to their support while trying to intimidate judges and insurance commissioners. So who began all this? In May 2001 an insurance claimant and shareholder, Cesar Balbin stepped into the annual shareholders meetings. For the first time ever in the company’s history, AIG was publicly accused of criminal and civil racketeering activities including: extortion, blackmale, claims fraud, theft of company equity: it took with it the chairman, billions of dollars and led to a greater transparency and fear that possibly contributed to inaction by many at AIG to participate in its typically less than legal and proper activities required to keep the company afloat.“Letter from Maurice Greenberg to AIG Ceo and Board of Directors” (PDF). WikiLeaks. September 16, 2008. Archived from the original on September 23, 2008. Retrieved September 17, 2008.
  42. ^ Federal Reserve Act: Section 13. Powers of Federal Reserve Banks Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Retrieved September 17, 2008.
  43. ^ 12 U.S.C. ch.3 subch.IX
  44. ^ FORM 8-K Current Report, American International Group (September 18, 2008).EDGAR United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Retrieved September 20, 2008.
  45. ^ Son, Hugh (September 20, 2008). “AIG Filing on Takeover Omits Reference to Shareholder Meeting”Bloomberg. Retrieved September 20, 2008.
  46. ^ “AIG booted out of the Dow”. CNN Money. September 18, 2008.
  47. ^ Son, Hugh (October 24, 2008). “AIG Taps $90.3 billion From Fed, CEO Says More May Be Needed”. Bloomberg. Retrieved October 24, 2008.
  48. ^ Mark Ruquet, “Greenberg Pans AIG “Nationalization”, National Underwriter Life & Health, September 18, 2008
  49. ^ Cassidy, John (December 1, 2008). “Anatomy of a Meltdown: Ben Bernanke and the financial crisis.”The New YorkerArchived from the original on December 04 2008. Retrieved November 29, 2008.
  50. ^ “Press Release (AIG)”. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. October 8, 2008.Archived from the original on October 11, 2008. Retrieved November 10, 2008.
  51. ^ “How AIG got Uncle Sam over a barrel”The Economist. November 13, 2008.Archived from the original on December 04 2008. Retrieved November 20, 2008.
  52. a b c Sorkin, Andrew Ross; Mary Williams Walsh (November 10, 2008). “U.S. Provides More Aid to Big Insurer”New York Times. Retrieved November 10, 2008.
  53. ^ “Treasury to Invest in AIG Restructuring Under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act” (Press release). United States Department of the Treasury. November 10, 2008. Archived from the original on November 12, 2008. Retrieved November 12, 2008.
  54. a b “Press Release (AIG)”. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. November 10, 2008. Archived from the original on December 20, 2008. Retrieved November 10, 2008.
  55. ^ Kevin J. Murray v. Henry M. Paulson, filed December 15, 2008, p. 9
  56. ^ “Frequently Asked Questions regarding AIG Takaful”. Aigtakaful-enaya.com. June 15, 2011. Archived from the original on July 07 2011. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  57. ^ Gordon, Marcy (January 26, 2012). “Report: Taxpayers still owed $133B from bailout”The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Associated Press. Retrieved January 26, 2012.
  58. ^ Lanman, Scott (March 5, 2009). “Bloomberg – Senators Dodd & Shelby Demand Information”. Bloomberg. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  59. ^ AIG’s mysterious Schedule A finally revealed Matthew Goldstein, reuters DealZone, Jan 27, 2010, accessed 2010 4 21
  60. ^ AIG (date unknown). “Schedule A – List of Derivative Transactions” (PDF). Reuters. Retrieved 2010 4 29.
  61. ^ “Bernanke-AIG Testimony”. Federalreserve.gov. March 24, 2009. Archivedfrom the original on June 07 2011. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  62. ^ Taylor, Andrew (October 8, 2008). “AIG execs’ retreat after bailout angers lawmakers”. Associated Press.[dead link]
  63. ^ “AIG execs waste bailout portion”. October 11, 2008.
  64. ^ Lapidos, Juliet (October 8, 2008). “Can Paulson Fire Naughty Executives? How much control does the Treasury have over personnel at AIG?”. Slate.
  65. ^ Fed grants AIG $37.8 billion loan, International Herald Tribune, October 8, 2008
  66. ^ Augstums, Ieva (October 17, 2008). “AIG executives spent thousands during hunting trip”. Associated Press.[dead link]
  67. ^ AIG Already Running Through Government Loans, CNBC, October 30, 2008
  68. ^ Another AIG Resort “Junket”: Top Execs Caught on Tape , ABC News, November 10, 2008
  69. ^ Brettell, Karen (October 22, 2008). “UPDATE 1-Payment on Lehman CDS only around $5.2 bln -DTCC”. Reuters.
  70. ^ “Seekingalpha.com”. Seekingalpha.com. October 13, 2008. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  71. ^ Son, Hugh (December 10, 2008). “AIG CDS Payouts and Retirements”. Bloomberg. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  72. ^ “AIG – Related Resources”. Aig.com. April 28, 2011. Archived from the original on July 7, 2011. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  73. ^ AIG released some figures about where it’s government bailout money had been spent in 2009. The data for this table was from a page entitled “Attachment A: Collateral Postings under AIGFP CDS”. This was an attachment to another AIG document entitled “AIG Discloses Counterparties to CDS, GIA, and Securities Lending Transactions”. Please see: “Counterparty Attachment 3-18-2009” (PDF). aig.com. March 18, 2009. Retrieved April 23, 2010. for the attachment. Or this page at AIG for more info. (If this is moved, please also see politico.com)
  74. ^ Per source; however, the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (established by the U.S. government under Herbert Hoover) was dissolved in 1957.
  75. ^ Bansal, Paritosh (February 24, 2009). “AIG may rethink asset sales in tough markets : Deals : Reuters”. Reuters UK. Archived from the original on February 28, 2009. Retrieved March 2, 2009.
  76. ^ Munich Re buys AIG’s Hartford Steam Boiler for $742m
  77. ^ Munich Re concludes purchase of Hartford Steam Boiler
  78. ^ Lifsher, Marc; Zimmerman, Martin (April 17, 2009). “AIG to sell 21st Century to Farmers Insurance”Los Angeles Times.
  79. ^ AIG Hawaii part of $2B sale
  80. ^ AIG confirms sale of Transatlantic Re shares
  81. ^ Carew, Rick (September 7, 2009). “Li Is Back In Game With AIG Purchase”The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  82. ^ “Prudential confirms AIG move”Radio Television Hong Kong. March 1, 2010.Archived from the original on June 05 2011. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  83. ^ “Debevoise Advises AIG in Sale of Its Asian Life Insurance Unit (AIA) to Prudential PLC for $35.5 billion”. Finanznachrichten.de. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  84. ^ “Pru deal near collapse as AIG snubs lower offer”. Reuters. June 1, 2010.
  85. ^ Son, Hugh (March 29, 2010). “AIG Completes Sale of PineBridge Investments to Pacific Century”. Bloomberg. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  86. ^ http://www.courierpress.com/news/2010/aug/11/80-percent-american-general-finance-sold-aig/?partner=RSS
  87. ^ “AIG to sell Star, Edison to Prudential”MarketWatch. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  88. ^ Bernard, Stephen (November 1, 2010). “AIG Set to repay $37 billion in bailout money”The Washington Times. Associated Press.
  89. ^ “AIG to sell $2 billion in AIA shares, repay US government”The New York Post. 6 September 2012. Retrieved 6 September 2012.
  90. a b “AIG reports record $61.7bn loss”. BBC News. March 3, 2009. Archivedfrom the original on March 03 2009. Retrieved March 2, 2009.
  91. ^ “Dow slides below 7,000; AIG takes $62B hit”. CNN. March 2, 2009. Archivedfrom the original on March 06 2009. Retrieved March 2, 2009.
  92. ^ “US stocks slide to 12-year trough”. BBC News. March 2, 2009. Retrieved March 2, 2008.
  93. ^ “Markets routed as AIG reveals $62B loss”. CNN. March 2, 2009. Archivedfrom the original on March 03 2009. Retrieved March 2, 2009.
  94. a b “AIG gets new aid after record $61.7 billion loss”. Reuters. March 2, 2009.Archived from the original on March 06 2009. Retrieved March 2, 2009.
  95. a b Boyle, Catherine; Judge, Elizabeth (March 2, 2009). “AIG makes America’s largest loss amid new rescue”The Times (London). Retrieved March 2, 2009.
  96. ^ Stout, David; Knowlton, Brian (March 3, 2009). “Fed Chief Says Insurance Giant Acted Irresponsibly”The New York TimesArchived from the original on March 07 2009. Retrieved March 4, 2009.
  97. ^ Wednesday, April 7, 2010 as of 11:14 am ET (April 7, 2010).“Emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com”. Emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com. Archived from the original on July 11, 2011. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  98. ^ “U.S. Senate vote on Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008”. Senate.gov. Archived from the original on June 29, 2011. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  99. ^ “Obama’s Statement on A.I.G”The New York Times. March 16, 2009.
  100. a b “Rawhistory.com”. Rawstory.com. March 17, 2009. Archived from the original on June 28, 2011. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  101. ^ Kennedy, Helen (March 17, 2009). “AIG bonus checks may be taxed at up to 100%, says Sen. Chuck Schumer”Daily News (New York).
  102. a b c Google.com[dead link]
  103. ^ Homan, Timothy R. (March 16, 2009). “Bloomgberg.com”. Bloomberg. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  104. a b Mintz, Phil (March 17, 2009). “Off With Their Heads: Samples of AIG Outrage”Bloomberg BusinessWeek. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  105. a b MSNBC.msn.com[dead link]
  106. ^ Homan, Timothy R. (March 16, 2009). “Bloomberg.com”. Bloomberg. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  107. ^ Transcript:’ Austan Goolsbee on ‘FNS”. Fox News. March 16, 2009.
  108. ^ “‘Special Report’ Panel on Outrage Over AIG Bonuses”. Fox News. March 17, 2009.
  109. ^ CBS.com[dead link]
  110. a b “Businessweek.com”Bloomberg BusinessWeek. March 17, 2009. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  111. ^ “Firstread.msnbc.msn.com”. Firstread.msnbc.msn.com. March 17, 2009. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  112. ^ “Thedailyshow.com”. Thedailyshow.com. March 16, 2009. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  113. ^ AP Photo/Mark Lennihan (March 17, 2009). “AIG’s arrogance is stunning”. Blog.nj.com. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  114. ^ “AIG Bonus Babies”The Washington Post.
  115. ^ Lenzner, Robert (March 17, 2009). “Hank Greenberg Shares The Blame For AIG’s Pain”Forbes.
  116. ^ “Bigger question raised-AIG’s bonuses Thebigmoney.com]
  117. ^ Jake DeSantis, Dear AIG, I Quit! New York Times, March 25, 2009
  118. ^ “CNN.com Video”. CNN. Retrieved April 23, 2010.
  119. ^ “Washingtontimes.com”The Washington Times. March 30, 2009. Archivedfrom the original on June 07 2011. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  120. ^ WFSB.com[dead link]
  121. ^ John Carney (March 30, 2009). “AIG boss pressed employees to give to Dodd”. Businessinsider.com. Archived from the original on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  122. ^ Video1.washingtontimes.com
  123. ^ “Man Utd announce new shirt deal with Aon”. June 3, 2009.
  124. ^ “AIG Posts Loss on Writedowns Tied to AIA, Mortgage Declines”. November 4, 2011.
  125. ^ “AIG Forks Up $126 million to SEC on PNC Deals”. Insurance Journal. November 24, 2004. Archived from the original on August 29, 2008. Retrieved September 18, 2008.
  126. ^ “AIG Investors Seek Ouster of Chief Executive Sullivan”. Bloomberg. June 11, 2008. Retrieved July 21, 2008.
  127. ^ Judge Allows ‘Death Bet’ Case, Leslie Scism and Mark Maremont, Wall Street Journal, 2010 10 5
  128. ^ “AIG May Join Suit Over US Bailout”ABC News. January 8, 2013.
  129. ^ “AIG will not join lawsuit against US”. BBC News. January 9, 2013.
  130. ^ “AIG to Pay $800 million to Settle Securities Fraud Charges by SEC; Over $1.6 billion to be Paid to Resolve Federal and New York State Actions”Securities and Exchange Commission. February 9, 2006.
  131. ^ “Board of Directors “. American International Group. Retrieved October 24, 2011.

References and further reading

[edit]External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: American International Group
Posted in Banking, Business, Economics, Education, Historical, Money, New Zealand, Photography, Politics, Product review, Social Commentary, United States, West Coast | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Where’s that Naughty BaBear?

 

 

Off the Top of My Head

By Paul Murray

Our daughter Diva loves the BaBear game we invented…we hide BaBear around the house and she hunts him down and brings him back to us….we’re basically training her to be a hunter and gatherer.

Diva is really very good at this game and we are running out of hiding places for BaBear…perhaps we’ll take him on holiday…or start hiding him in the garden as the summer weather is so nice here in Sunny Karamea…here are some photos of the BaBear game…I guess we could put Diva in front of the TV to keep her entertained…but where’s the fun in that?

 

RGO_1220 RGO_1221 RGO_1225 RGO_1227 RGO_1228 RGO_1234 RGO_1235 RGO_1237 RGO_1243 RGO_1246 RGO_1247 RGO_1248 RGO_1249 RGO_1251 RGO_1257 RGO_1268

Posted in Children, Education, Funny, Hilarious, Humor, Humour, Japan, Karamea, LivinginPeace Project, Marriage, New Zealand, Peace, Photography, Social Commentary, West Coast | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Clever Ideas to Simplify Your Life

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-22

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-1

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-2

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-3

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-4

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-5

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-6

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-7

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-8

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-9

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-10

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-11

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-12

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-13

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-14

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-15

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-16

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-17

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-18

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-19

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-20

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-21

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-23

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-24

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-25

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-26

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-27

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-28

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-29

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-30

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-31

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-32

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-33

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-34

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-35

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-36

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-37

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-38

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-39

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-40

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-41

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-42

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-43

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-44

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-45

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-46

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-47

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-48

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-gifs-1

life-hacks-how-to-make-your-life-easier-gifs-21

 

Posted in Education, Funny, Humor, Humour, Photography, Product review, Social Commentary | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Japanese Artist Brings ‘Inspiration’ To Re-Invent

Japanese artist Shota Kawahara works on a landscape painting at Re-Invent Art Gallery in Lake Forest
 

Japanese artist Shota Kawahara made his American debut recently with his first art exhibition titled “Inspiration,” which will run at the Lake Forest art gallery and retail shop Re-Invent until Sept. 29.

Shota’s journey to Lake Forest started when he met Re-Invent co-owner and Lake Forest High School graduate Kristin Mikrut while they were both resident artists at the Living in Peace Project in Karamea located on the West Coast of the South Island of New Zealand.

Mikrut returned to Lake Forest and opened Re-Invent in May 2012 with childhood friend and Lake Forest Academy graduate Cecilia Lanyon. Familiar with the depth of Shota’s diverse talent, Mikrut and Lanyon asked him to showcase his work in their hometown and to be Re-Invent’s first resident artist.

“My whole idea of being artist is to inspire people,” Shota said. “Not only by my art works but also by my way of living, traveling, sharing experience and passion.”

More than 10 volunteers from the Lake Forest community helped Shota prepare for his exhibition, which in addition to his “abstract landscape” paintings, features collaboration work with gallery co-owners Kristin and Cecilia and a video about the Living in Peace Project.

A portion of the proceeds from “Inspiration” also will benefit the Lake Forest-Lake Bluff Rotary Club’s fundraising outreach for Rotary International tsunami relief efforts.

Abstract beauty by Shota Kawahara
 

Before arriving in the United States, Kawahara traveled the world for the past seven years to find inspiration, experience and knowledge for his art. He also is a graduate of the Kyoto University art faculty.

On his website, Shota attributed nature as his biggest inspiration for his “abstract landscape style.”

Shota described the paintings as “vibrant, intense, highly worked in colorful detail, unique and uplifting.” The paintings featured over 30 individual colors with immense details and layers of complex composition masked by simple shapes meant to stimulate imagination, bring out one’s inner creativity and subconscious.

According to Shota, “Each shape is quite simple, but there are layers of complex composition and detail. That’s why people never quite understand the whole painting. Each time when people look at it they find different shapes and stories.”

For him, “art is a means of visualizing one’s philosophy.” Like the exhibition’s name, Shota hopes his art will “inspire people to open their mind and heart.”

To learn more about “Inspiration” visit www.shotakawahara.com, or check it out in person at Re-Invent, 202 Wisconsin Ave, Lake Forest, IL.

By Paige Wagenknecht, GazeboNews assistant editor
Posted in Art, Business, Japan, Karamea, LivinginPeace Project, New Zealand, Photography, United States | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Experts Fear Collapse of Global Civilisation

UXBRIDGE, Canada, Jan 11, 2013 (IPS) – Experts on the health of our planet are terrified of the future. They can clearly see the coming collapse of global civilisation from an array of interconnected environmental problems.

By Stephen Leahy (With cynical embellishment by Paul Murray)

“We’re all scared,” said Paul Ehrlich, president of the Center for Conservation Biology at Stanford University.

“But we must tell the truth about what’s happening and challenge people to do something to prevent it,” Ehrlich told IPS.

Global collapse of human civilisation seems likely, write Ehrlich and his partner Anne Ehrlich in the prestigious science journal, Proceedings of the Royal Society.

This collapse will take the form of a “…gradual breakdown because famines, epidemics and resource shortages cause a disintegration of central control within nations, in concert with disruptions of trade and conflicts over increasingly scarce necessities”, they write.

Already two billion people are hungry today. Food production is humanity’s biggest industry and is already being affected by climate and other environmental problems. “No civilisation can avoid collapse if it fails to feed its population,” the authors say.

Escalating climate disruption, ocean acidification, oceanic dead zones, depletion of groundwater and extinctions of plants and animals are the main drivers of the coming collapse, they write in their peer-reviewed article “Can a collapse of global civilisation be avoided?” published this week.

Dozens of earth systems experts were consulted in writing the 10-page paper that contains over 160 references.

“We talked to many of the world’s leading experts to reflect what is really happening,” said Ehrlich, who is an eminent biologist and winner of many scientific awards.

Our reality is that current overconsumption of natural resources and the resulting damage to life-sustaining services nature provides means we need another half of a planet to keeping going. And that’s if all seven billion remain at their current living standards, the Ehrlichs write.

If everyone lived like a U.S. citizen, another four or five planets would be needed.

Global population is projected to increase by 2.5 billion by 2050. It doesn’t take an expert to conclude that collapse of civilisation will be unavoidable without major changes.

We’re facing a future where billions will likely die, and yet little is being done to avoid certain disaster, he said.

“Policy makers and the public aren’t terrified about this because they don’t have the information or the knowledge about how our planet functions,” he said.

Last March, the world’s scientific community provided the first-ever “state of the planet” assessment at the “Planet Under Pressure” conference  in London. More than 3,000 experts concluded humanity is facing a “planetary emergency” and there was no time to lose in making large-scale changes.

In 2010, a coalition of the national scientific bodies and international scientific unions from 141 countries warned that “the continued functioning of the Earth system as we know it is at risk”.

“The situation is absolutely desperate and yet there’s nothing on the front pages or on the agenda of world leaders,” said Pat Mooney, head of the international environmental organisation ETC Group.

“The lack of attention is a tragedy,” Mooney previously told IPS.

Solutions exist and are briefly outlined in the Ehrlich paper. However, these require sweeping changes. All nations need to do everything they can to reduce their emissions of fossil fuels regardless of actions or lack of them by any other country, he said.

Protection of the Earth’s biodiversity must take centre stage in all policy and economic decisions. Water and energy systems must be re-engineered. Agriculture must shift from fossil-fuel intensive industrial monocultures to ecologically-based systems of food production. Resilience and flexibility will be essential for civilisation to survive.

A key element in meeting this unprecedented challenge is “…to see ourselves as utterly embedded in Nature and not somehow separate from those precious systems that sustain all life”, writes England’s Prince Charles commenting on the Ehrlich’s paper.

“To continue with ‘business as usual’ is an act of suicide on a gargantuan scale,” Prince Charles concluded from his holiday castle over a dinner of swan.

Posted in Agriculture, Banking, Business, Economics, Education, Environment, Money, Permaculture, Politics, Social Commentary, Uncategorized, United States | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Where’s BaBear?

“Ba” means “Boo” in Japanese and “BaBear” is the name given to our daughter Diva’s little panda, which she received as a gift from a nice lady at the Novotel Hotel near Auckland Airport. We stayed there on the way to and from Australia on our recent trip to Adelaide.

Diva was given a choice of several soft toys and she chose BaBear.

Of all her toys; including Murphy, Cow, Tigger, Gooby, Twitty, HeffaLump, Roo, Wog and Thing, BaBear is by far and away her most favorite.

RGO_1222

Gooby

RGO_1224

Wog

RGO_1226

Tigger

RGO_1227

Cow

RGO_1228

Twitty

RGO_1233

Thing

RGO_1235

Roo

RGO_1237

Murphy

RGO_1241

HeffaLump

We have invented a game called “Where’s BaBear” in which we hide BaBear around the house and Diva looks for him and eventually finds him. She’s very good at this game and we have not yet managed to hide him successfully…she’s found him every time.

RGO_1221

RGO_1210

This was a difficult one…BaBear was hidden here by our friend Luke…but Diva found him in half an hour.

RGO_1021-2 RGO_1021 RGO_1022-2 RGO_1022 RGO_1023-2 RGO_1023-3 RGO_1023-4 RGO_1023 RGO_1024-2 RGO_1024-3
RGO_1026
RGO_1029-2 RGO_1029-3 RGO_1029 RGO_1030-2 RGO_1030-3 RGO_1031-2 RGO_1031 RGO_1032 RGO_1033 RGO_1035 RGO_1036 RGO_1037 RGO_1046 RGO_1049 RGO_1050 RGO_1054 RGO_1060 RGO_1062 RGO_1068-2 RGO_1068 RGO_1069 RGO_1070-2 RGO_1070-3 RGO_1070 RGO_1071 RGO_1072 RGO_1073-2 RGO_1073 RGO_1074
RGO_1076 RGO_1077-2 RGO_1079-2 RGO_1079 RGO_1081 RGO_1083 RGO_1087 RGO_1089

BaBear II

RGO_1092 RGO_1094 RGO_1098 RGO_1211 RGO_1212 RGO_1220 RGO_1223

When she finds BaBear, she points and says “Ba.” We congratulate her for being so clever and then help her to retrieve him. She always grabs him and looks at him as if to say, “What on Earth were you doing in there you naughty BaBear!”

Posted in Children, Education, Funny, Hilarious, Humor, Humour, Karamea, LivinginPeace Project, New Zealand, Photography, Uncategorized, West Coast | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Introducing Elena Gilis: Queen of Rongolia

Off the Top of My Head

By Paul Murray
 
Elena

The LivinginPeace Project welcomes Belgian student Elena Gilis, who is studying Human Ecology at the College of the Atlantic (CoA) in Maine, USA, and has joined us as an intern from January 3 to March 15, 2013.

CoA states on its Web site that the college “is for idealists with elbow grease, for people who see the world as a complex, interconnected place. It’s for people who want to make the world a better place.”

Elena sees her studies in Human Ecology as holistic preparation for herself to eventually tackle some of the challenges facing humans today and into the future. “Human Ecology is a multi-discipinary course that covers a range of subjects including; art, science, history and also love and ethics…it’s a broad subject, but there are so many things to fix in this world and everything is interconnected” she said.

She chose to study at the CoA as the university is innovative, and progressive and has a flexible curriculum and an alternative approach to study. The programme is very open and free and it enables the students to take charge of their own learning. “I realised that my education is up to me, I am responsible for my studies and whatever I derive from it and the University of the Atlantic has the flexibility that enables me to design my own educational destiny,” she said.

Studying in the United States is legendarily expensive, but Elena was fortunate to be selected as a scholarship student, half of her school fees are met by a benevolent donor and the other half is paid by the school, which benefits from having international students like Elena and the fresh perspectives they bring from their respective backgrounds.

The university has only 400 students, so class sizes are small, much of the alternative curriculum is assessed on course work and student reports, there are no exams in the human ecology major and field work is encouraged. So Elena began looking for a suitable place to further her practical knowledge and experience and decided to travel to Karamea on the West Coast of the South Island of New Zealand.

She discovered the LivinginPeace Project, which  incorporates, art, travel, permaculture and education into a sustainable business, and determined that the venture incorporated many of her areas of interest. “I was searching for a project that involved community, one that was not just working on a farm…the LivinginPeace Project is human ecology in action,” she said.

The LivinginPeace Project team welcome Elena and look forward to both working with her and learning from her.

LiP Logo

Elena’s LivinginPeace Project Internship Objectives:

  • Learning Goals and Objectives

Interning at the LivingInPeace project, I expect to assist in running the business, taking on diverse responsibilities — staff coordination, financial management, interior decoration, tour guiding and organizing  — and assist the business in its pursuit for sustainability. I will also be working on the farm and some work at the hotel (such as preparing meals, greeting guests, etc…)

 Learning objectives in brief

  • Permaculture skills – working, running and planning of an agroecological farm
  • Assessing and investigating business’ sustainability
  • Implementing and organizing sustainability measures and activities
  • Better understanding the business model of the LivingInPeace project as well as its book-keeping and daily running
  • Organizing and leading activities  
  • Practicing art and learn how to integrate it into daily activities.
  • Acquire some radio experience – programming and animating
  • Practice flexibility, patience, and trust of my own skills; accepting my limitation, and embracing challenges

Elena has also studied on scholarship at the United World College in Costa Rica and speaks fluent German, French, Spanish, English and is competent in Dutch. We are very fortunate to have Elena with us for the next six weeks and look forward to her input, ideas, innovations and initiatives on how to improve our operation, make it more energy efficient, environmentally responsible and socially harmonious and hope Elena will in return pick up some good ideas she can implement elsewhere on her life adventure.

RGO_1253

Elena Gilis (left) with the Rongolians in the jungle

Human ecology

Human ecology is the subdiscipline of ecology that focuses on humans. More broadly, it is an interdisciplinary andtransdisciplinary study of the relationship between humans and their naturalsocial, and built environments. The term ‘human ecology’ appeared in a 1907 work on sanitary practices in the home and surrounding environments. The term also appeared in a sociological study in 1921 and at times has been equated with geography. The scientific philosophy of human ecology has a diffuse history with advancements in geographysociologypsychologyanthropologyzoology,family and consumer science, and natural ecology.

A less formal history of ecology can be traced to the Greeks and a lengthy list of developments in natural history science. Ecology also has notably developed in other cultures. Traditional knowledge, as it is called, includes the human propensity for intuitive knowledge, intelligent relations, understanding, and for passing on information about the natural world and the human experience. The term ecology was coined by Ernst Haeckel in 1866 and defined by direct reference to the economy of nature.

Historical development

Like other contemporary researchers of his time, Haeckel adopted his terminology from Carl Linnaeus where human ecological connections were more evident. In his 1749 publication, Specimen academicum de oeconomia naturae, Linnaeus developed a science that included the economy and polis of nature. Polis stems from its Greek roots for a political community (originally based on the city-states), sharing its roots with the word police in reference to the promotion of growth and maintenance of good social order in a community. Linnaeus was also the first to write about the close affinity between humans and primates. Linnaeus presented early ideas found in modern aspects to human ecology, including the balance of nature while highlighting the importance of ecological functions (ecosystem services or natural capital in modern terms): “In exchange for performing its function satisfactorily, nature provided a species with the necessaries of life” The work of Linnaeus influenced Charles Darwin and other scientists of his time who used Linnaeus’ terminology (i.e., the economy and polis of nature) with direct implications on matters of human affairs, ecology, and economics.

An early and influential social scientist in the history of human ecology was Herbert Spencer. Spencer was influenced by and reciprocated his influence onto the works of Charles Darwin. Herbert Spencer coined the phrase survival of the fittest, he was an early founder of sociology where he developed the idea of society as an organism, and he created an early precedent for the socio-ecological approach that was the subsequent aim and link between sociology and human ecology.[3][16][17]

Human ecology is the discipline that inquires into the patterns and process of interaction of humans with their environments. Human values, wealth, life-styles, resource use, and waste, etc. must affect and be affected by the physical and biotic environments along urban-rural gradients. The nature of these interactions is a legitimate ecological research topic and one of increasing importance.

Ecology is not just biological, but a human science as well. American chemist and founder of the field of home economicsEllen Swallow Richards is credited with bringing the term “ecology” into English-language use, first introducing the term as “oekology” in 1892, and subsequently developing the term “human ecology.” The term “human ecology” was published in Richard’s 1907 work “Sanitation in Daily Life”, defined as “the study of the surroundings of human beings in the effects they produce in the lives of men.” Richard’s use of the term recognized humans as part of rather than separate from nature.

The term “Human ecology” made its first formal appearance in sociological works in a sociological study in 1921.However, the history of human ecology has strong roots in geography and sociobiology departments of the late 19th century. In this context a major historical development or landmark that stimulated research into the ecological relations between humans and their urban environments was founded in George Perkins Marsh‘s book “Man and Nature; or, physical geography as modified by human action“, which was published in 1864. Marsh was interested in the active agency of human-nature interactions (an early precursor to urban ecology or human niche construction) in frequent reference to the economy of nature.

In 1894, an influential sociologist at the University of Chicago named Albion W. Small, collaborated with sociologist George E. Vincent and published a “‘‘laboratory guide’’ to studying people in their ‘‘every-day occupations.’’” This was a guidebook that trained students of sociology how they could study society in a way that a natural historian would study birds. Their publication “explicitly included the relation of the social world to the material environment.” Robert E. Park and Ernest W. Burgess(also from the sociology department at the University of Chicago) published a 1921 book on “Introduction to the Science of Sociology” where the term human ecology was used. Their student, Roderick D. McKenzie helped solidify human ecology as a sub-discipline within the Chicago school. These authors emphasized the difference between human ecology and ecology in general by highlighting cultural evolution in human societies.

Human ecology has a fragmented academic history with developments spread throughout a range of disciplines, including: home economicsgeographyanthropology,sociologyzoology, and psychology. Some authors have argued that geography is human ecology. Much historical debate has hinged on the placement of humanity as part or as separate from nature. In light of the branching debate of what constitutes human ecology, recent interdisciplinary researchers have sought a unifying scientific field they have titled coupled human and natural systems that “builds on but moves beyond previous work (e.g., human ecology, ecological anthropology, environmental geography).” Other fields or branches related to the historical development of human ecology as a discipline include cultural ecologyurban ecology,environmental sociology, and anthropological ecology.

Biological ecologists have traditionally been reluctant to study human ecology gravitating instead to the allure of wild nature. Human ecology has a history of focusing attention on humans’ impact on the biotic world. Paul Sears was an early proponent of applying human ecology, addressing topics aimed at the population explosion of humanity, global resource limits, pollution, and published a comprehensive account on human ecology as a discipline in 1954. He saw the vast “explosion” of problems humans were creating for the environment and reminded us that “what is important is the work to be done rather than the label.” “When we as a profession learn to diagnose the total landscape, not only as the basis of our culture, but as an expression of it, and to share our special knowledge as widely as we can, we need not fear that our work will be ignored or that our efforts will be unappreciated.”

Overview

Human ecology has been defined as a type of analysis applied to the relations in human beings that was traditionally applied to plants and animals in ecology. Toward this aim, human ecologists (or sociologists) integrate diverse perspectives from a broad spectrum of disciplines covering “wider points of view.” In its 1972 premier edition, the editors of Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal gave an introductory statement on the scope of topics in human ecology. Their statement provides a broad overview on the interdisciplinary nature of the topic:

  • Genetic, physiological, and social adaptation to the environment and to environmental change;
  • The role of social, cultural, and psychological factors in the maintenance or disruption of ecosystems;
  • Effects of population density on health, social organization, or environmental quality;
  • New adaptive problems in urban environments;
  • Interrelations of technological and environmental changes;
  • The development of unifying principles in the study of biological and cutlural adaptation;
  • The genesis of maladaptations in human biological and cultural evolution;
  • The relation of food quality and quantity to physical and intellectual performance and to demographic change;
  • The application of computers, remote sensing devices, and other new tools and techniques

Forty years later in the same journal, Daniel G. Bates (2012) notes lines of continuity in the discipline and the way it has changed:

Today there is greater emphasis on the problems facing individuals and how actors deal with them with the consequence that there is much more attention to decision-making at the individual level as people strategize and optimize risk, costs and benefits within specific contexts. Rather than attempting to formulate a cultural ecology or even a specifically “human ecology” model, researchers more often draw on demographic, economic and evolutionary theory as well as upon models derived from field ecology.

While theoretical discussions continue, research published in Human Ecology Review suggests that recent discourse has shifted toward applying principles of human ecology. Some of these applications focus instead on addressing problems that cross disciplinary boundaries or transcend those boundaries altogether. Scholarship has increasingly tended away from Gerald L. Young‘s idea of a “unified theory” of human ecological knowledge—that human ecology may emerge as its own discipline—and more toward the pluralism best espoused by Paul Shepard: that human ecology is healthiest when “running out in all directions.”. But human ecology is neither anti-discipline nor anti-theory, rather it is the ongoing attempt to formulate, synthesize, and apply theory to bridge the widening schism between man and nature. This new human ecology emphasizes complexity over reductionism, focuses on changes over stable states, and expands ecological concepts beyond plants and animals to include people.

Connection to Home Economics

In addition to its links to other disciplines, human ecology has a strong historical linkage to the field of home economics through the work of Ellen Swallow Richards, among others. However, as early as the 1960’s, a number of universities began to rename “home economics” departments, schools, and colleges as “human ecology” programs. In part, this name change was a response to perceived difficulties with the term “home economics” in a modernizing society, and reflects a recognition of “human ecology” as one of the initial choices for the discipline which was to become “home economics”. Current Human Ecology programs include Cornell University College of Human Ecology and the University of Alberta’s Department of Human Ecology, among others.

Niche of the Anthropocene

Perhaps the most important implication involves our view of human society. Homo sapiens is not an external disturbance, it is a keystone species within the system. In the long term, it may not be the magnitude of extracted goods and services that will determine sustainability. It may well be our disruption of ecological recovery and stability mechanisms that determines system collapse.

Changes to the Earth by human activities have been so great that a new geological epoch named the Anthropocene has been proposed. The human niche or ecological polis of human society, as it was known historically, has created entirely new arrangements of ecosystems as we convert matter into technology. Human ecology has created anthropogenic biomes (called anthromes). The habitats within these anthromes reach out through our road networks to create what has been called technoecosystems containing technosolsTechnodiversity exists within these technoecosystems. In direct parallel to the concept of the ecosphere, human civilization has also created a technosphere. The way that the human species engineers or constructs technodiversity into the environment, threads back into the processes of cultural and biological evolution, including the human economy.

Ecosystem services

bumblebee pollinating a flower, one example of an ecosystem service

The ecosystems of planet Earth are coupled to human environments. Ecosystems regulate the global geophysical cycles of energy, climate, soil nutrients, and water that in turn support and grow natural capital (including the environmental, physiological, cognitive, cultural, and spiritual dimensions of life). Ultimately, every manufactured product in human environments comes from natural systems. Ecosystems are considered common-pool resources because ecosystems do not exclude beneficiaries and they can be depleted or degraded. For example, green space within communities provides sustainable health services that reduces mortality and regulates the spread of vector borne disease. Research shows that people who are more engaged with regular access to natural areas have lower rates of diabetes, heart disease and psychological disorders. These ecological health services are regularly depleted through urban development projects that do not factor in the common-pool value of ecosystems.

The ecological commons delivers a diverse supply of community services that sustains the well-being of human society. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, an international UN initiative involving more than 1,360 experts worldwide, identifies four main ecosystem service types having 30 sub-categories stemming from natural capital. The ecological commons includes provisioning (e.g., food, raw materials, medicine, water supplies), regulating (e.g., climate, water, soil retention, flood retention), cultural (e.g., science and education, artistic, spiritual), and supporting (e.g., soil formation, nutrient cycling, water cycling) services.

Policy and human institutions should rarely assume that human enterprise is benign. A safer assumption holds that human enterprise almost always exacts an ecological toll – a debit taken from the ecological commons.

Sixth mass extinction

Global assessments of biodiversity indicate that the current epoch, the Holocene (or Anthropocene) is a sixth mass extinction. Species loss is accelerating at 100–1000 times faster than average background rates in the fossil record. The field of conservation biology involves ecologists that are researching, confronting, and searching for solutions to sustain the planet’s ecosystems for future generations.

“Human activities are associated directly or indirectly with nearly every aspect of the current extinction spasm.”

Nature is a resilient system. Ecosystems regenerate, withstand, and are forever adapting to fluctuating environments. Ecological resilience is an important conceptual framework in conservation management and it is defined as the preservation of biological relations in ecosystems that persevere and regenerate in response to disturbance over time. However, persistent, systematic, large and nonrandom disturbance caused by the niche constructing behavior of human beings, habitat conversion and land development, has pushed many of the Earth’s ecosystems to the extent of their resilient thresholds. Three planetary thresholds have already been crossed, including 1) biodiversity loss, 2) climate change, and 3) nitrogen cycles. These biophysical systems are ecologically interrelated and naturally resilient, but human civilization has transitioned the planet to an Anthropocene epoch, where the threshold for planetary scale resilience has been crossed and the ecological state of the Earth is deteriorating rapidly to the detriment of humanity. The world’s fisheries and oceans, for example, are facing dire challenges as the threat of global collapse appears imminent, with serious ramifications for the well-being of humanity; while the Anthropocene is yet to be classified as an official epoch, current evidence suggest that “an epoch-scale boundary has been crossed within the last two centuries.” The ecology of the planet is further threatened by global warming, but investments in nature conservation can provide a regulatory feedback to store and regulate carbon and other greenhouse gases.

Ecological footprint

While we are used to thinking of cities as geographically discrete places, most of the land “occupied” by their residents lies far beyond their borders. The total area of land required to sustain an urban region (its “ecological footprint”) is typically at least an order of magnitude greater than that contained within municipal boundaries or the associated built-up area.

In 1992, William Rees developed the ecological footprint concept. The ecological footprint and its close analog the water footprint has become a popular way of accounting for the level of impact that human society is imparting on the Earth’s ecosystems. All indications are that the human enterprise is unsustainable as the footprint of society is placing too much stress on the ecology of the planet. The WWF 2008 living planet report and other researchers report that human civilization has exceeded the bio-regenerative capacity of the planet. This means that the footprint of human consumption is extracting more natural resources than can be replenished by ecosystems around the world.

Ecological economics

Ecological economics is an economic science that extends its methods of valuation onto nature in an effort to address the inequity between market growth and biodiversity loss. Natural capital is the stock of materials or information stored in biodiversity that generates services that can enhance the welfare of communities. Population losses are the more sensitive indicator of natural capital than are species extinction in the accounting of ecosystem services. The prospect for recovery in the economic crisis of nature is grim. Populations, such as local ponds and patches of forest are being cleared away and lost at rates that exceed species extinctions. The mainstream growth-based economic system adopted by governments worldwide does not include a price or markets for natural capital. This type of economic system places further ecological debt onto future generations.

Many human-nature interactions occur indirectly due to the production and use of human-made (manufactured and synthesized) products, such as electronic appliances, furniture, plastics, airplanes, and automobiles. These products insulate humans from the natural environment, leading them to perceive less dependence on natural systems than is the case, but all manufactured products ultimately come from natural systems.

Human societies are increasingly being placed under stress as the ecological commons is diminished through an accounting system that has incorrectly assumed “… that nature is a fixed, indestructible capital asset.” The current wave of threats, including massive extinction rates and concurrent loss of natural capital to the detriment of human society, is happening rapidly. This is called a biodiversity crisis, because 50% of the worlds species are predicted to go extinct within the next 50 years. Conventional monetary analyses are unable to detect or deal with these sorts of ecological problems. Multiple global ecological economic initiatives are being promoted to solve this problem. For example, governments of the G8 met in 2007 and set forth The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) initiative:

In a global study we will initiate the process of analyzing the global economic benefit of biological diversity, the costs of the loss of biodiversity and the failure to take protective measures versus the costs of effective conservation.

The work of Kenneth E. Boulding is notable for building on the integration between ecology and its economic origins. Boulding drew parallels between ecology and economics, most generally in that they are both studies of individuals as members of a system, and indicated that the “household of man” and the “household of nature” could somehow be integrated to create a perspective of greater value.

Interdisciplinary approaches

Human ecology may be defined: (1) from a bio-ecological standpoint as the study of man as the ecological dominant in plant and animal communities and systems; (2) from a bio-ecological standpoint as simply another animal affecting and being affected by his physical environment; and (3) as a human being, somehow different from animal life in general, interacting with physical and modified environments in a distinctive and creative way. A truly interdisciplinary human ecology will most likely address itself to all three.

Human ecology expands functionalism from ecology to the human mind. People’s perception of a complex world is a function of their ability to be able to comprehend beyond the immediate, both in time and in space. This concept manifested in the popular slogan promoting sustainability: “think global, act local.” Moreover, people’s conception of community stems from not only their physical location but their mental and emotional connections and varies from “community as place, community as way of life, or community of collective action.”

In these early years, human ecology was still deeply enmeshed in its respective disciplines: geographysociology,anthropologypsychology, and economics. Scholars through the 1970s until present have called for a greater integration between all of the scattered disciplines that has each established formal ecological research.

In art

While some of the early writers considered how art fit into a human ecology, it was Sears who posed the idea that in the long run human ecology will in fact look more like art. Bill Carpenter (1986) calls human ecology the “possibility of an aesthetic science,” renewing dialogue about how art fits into a human ecological perspective. According to Carpenter, human ecology as an aesthetic science counters the disciplinary fragmentation of knowledge by examining human consciousness.

In education

While the reputation of human ecology in institutions of higher learning is growing, there is no human ecology at the primary and secondary education levels. Educational theorist Sir Kenneth Robinson has called for diversification of education to promote creativity in academic and non-academic (i.e.- educate their “whole being”) activities to implement a “new conception of human ecology”.

Bioregionalism and urban ecology

In the late 1960s, ecological concepts started to become integrated into the applied fields, namely architecturelandscape architecture, and planningIan McHarg called for a future when all planning would be “human ecological planning” by default, always bound up in humans’ relationships with their environments. He emphasized local, place-based planning that takes into consideration all the “layers” of information from geology to botany to zoology to cultural history. Proponents of the new urbanismmovement, like James Howard Kunstler and Andres Duany, have embraced the term human ecology as way to describe the problem of—and prescribe the solutions for—the landscapes and lifestyles of an automobile oriented society. Duany has called the human ecology movement to be “the agenda for the years ahead.” While McHargian planning is still widely respected, the landscape urbanism movement seeks a new understanding between human and environment relations. Among these theorists is Frederich Steiner, who published Human Ecology: Following Nature’s Lead in 2002 which focuses on the relationships among landscape, culture, and planning. The work highlights the beauty of scientific inquiry by revealing those purely human dimensions which underlie our concepts of ecology. While Steiner discusses specific ecological settings, such as cityscapes and waterscapes, and the relationships between socio-cultural and environmental regions, he also takes a diverse approach to ecology—considering even the unique synthesis between ecology and political geography. Deiter Steiner‘s 2003 Human Ecology: Fragments of Anti-fragmentary view of the world is an important expose of recent trends in human ecology. Part literature review, the book is divided into four sections: “human ecology”, “the implicit and the explicit”, “structuration”, and “the regional dimension”. Much of the work stresses the need for transciplinarity, antidualism, and wholeness of perspective.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Posted in Agriculture, Art, Business, Education, Environment, Kahurangi National Park, Karamea, Karamea Radio, LivinginPeace Project, New Zealand, Peace, Permaculture, Photography, Social Commentary, Travel, Uncategorized, United States, West Coast | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Happy New Year from The Rongolian Star

Rongolian New Year 2013.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment