This gallery contains 168 photos.
The Creative Vibrancy of Rongo Backpackers, Karamea Farm Baches and the LivinginPeace Project through the Eyes of Guests/Wwoofers/Friends Isabel Göermann and Petia Vowell.
This gallery contains 168 photos.
The Creative Vibrancy of Rongo Backpackers, Karamea Farm Baches and the LivinginPeace Project through the Eyes of Guests/Wwoofers/Friends Isabel Göermann and Petia Vowell.

The ingenuity of Kiwis has long been one of our strongest traits, making do with the tools and materials before us, we have learnt that something so simple as a dream is most definitely possible. History has shown this to be true from the likes of Burt Munroe with his Indian, Richard Pearse the pioneer aviator and Bruce McLaren, who as you should know, founded the McLaren F1 team.
From the iconic No.8 wire to the Bungee, amongst a smattering of Kiwis, legendary ideas have come to pass, one of those being born down in the South Island, with which I kick off with, the Britten V1000.
Born on the 1st of August in 1950, Christchurch, New Zealand. John quickly put his hand to work, showing an interest in motor vehicles at a very young age. Building his first motorised go-kart at the tender age of 12 and moving onto an old Indian Scout found in a ditch the next year.In 1968, John went on to undertake 4 years of a Mechanical Engineering course at a night school and from there, going on-wards and upwards, working on various projects and businesses.
In 1992, John founded the Britten Motorcycle Company, which at first, operated from his garage. Coming from small beginnings, the Britten Motorcycle Company would soon show the rest of the world what they were up against, and that a man with a dream is a force to be reckoned with.
John experimented with various materials, bikes and ideas before settling on his final design. He originally started with a bevel-drive Ducati race bike, but after being let down by both the motor and chassis, he fabricated his own custom frame and after trialing the NZ made Denco motors (which he also did back in 1986 with his Aero-D-One bike) he decided to produce his own engines.
Designing the engine from scratch, John came up with two engines for different classes, one being the V1000 and the other the V1100 which found it’s way into the Cardinal bike. John conceptualized the body work with No.8 wire and a hot glue gun around his home-made frame inside his garage at home, he then molded a woven carbon fibre fairing from his finished design into the body work that we all know and love today.
All up, the cost of the carbon fibre throughout the bike was around $2-300 worth, which is astonishing considering he built the entire bike out of it. The wheels, swing-arm and girder forks as well as the body, engine components and additional extras.
One of the problems John faced was that whilst carbon fibre is as light as a feather and hard as steel, it is extremely brittle and prone to crack when it is bolted onto other components. John’s solution to this was named the skin and bones method, which was to machine aluminium spools to serve as hard points. Carbon/Kevlar filaments were then wound around them under tension, he then went on to lay another layer of carbon fibre over top to finish it off.
The double wishbone forks were another interesting addition into the Britten, the only problem with those forks for motorcycle racing applications were that they could not be made light enough whilst still providing necessary stiffness with the conventional materials. John realized that carbon would be a perfect material to produce the forks which provided both strength and weight reduction among other benefits.
Though during testing of the bike 9 weeks before the Daytona race, the bike had a serious problem. The wishbone forks snapped under immense stress and injured rider Chris Haldane, snapping his collar bone. It was back to the workshop yet again to work on constructing an even stronger pair of forks in time for the ever closer Daytona Battle of the Twins.
The idea for the colour scheme of the Britten came from when John was away on holiday in Australia, he came back with a glass starfish with different shades of blue and violet, John told his mate Bob Brookland who works as a screen printer and who paints and restores motorcycles in his spare time that, that was how he wanted the Britten to be painted the next time, though true to tradition, the paint had to be specifically made to fit the requirements demanded by John.
The bike was completed with 3 days to spare before being shipped off to America to compete at the Daytona event, along with key crew members and then up and coming rider Andrew Stroud.
Auckland born rider Andrew Stroud was 19 when he entered racing in New Zealand, competing first in the NZ 250 production class and winning his first championship in 1988, he then went on to place 2nd in the 1988 Arai 500 km Superbike race. Stroud also raced in the U.S. Endurance series and the Suzuka 8 hours.
During practice the Britten performed just as had been hoped and all was looking well until Stroud pulled into the pits and an water/fuel mix was found leaking from the bike. John and his team set to work on finding the fault in a nearby mechanics school and discovered the problem to be a cracked cylinder sleeve.
With no replacements available, they did the one thing that Kiwi’s do best, improvise. Tirelessly throughout the night, John and the team worked away at welding the cylinder sleeve crack, though without a clue on if it would work and no idea on how to best weld a cylinder sleeve so they made it up as they went.
The bike was put back together with a few hours to spare and after generating large media and fan interest, the bike and team were swamped with punters coming to look at this one of a kind motorcycle.
It was only Strouds’ second time on the Britten since it had been completed and his first time on the Daytona racetrack, though that didn’t stop the young gun from taking the leading position away from Ducati but with only 1 lap left, rainfall had halted the race till the track had dried out.
The race was restarted with Stroud in front, the bike tore ahead and the Ducati rider could not get past the almighty Britten, with only 2 laps to go, the bike started to lose power.
Ducati stole the lead and Andrew Stroud pulled into pit lane shortly after. The problem, one of the few parts not made by Britten himself failed. The broken stator caused the battery to run flat just near the end of the race and what could have been a triumphant moment in motorcycle history for John, Stroud and the team, was dashed away with the failure of the stator.
All was not lost however, the Britten and Stroud caused a huge stir in the crowd and the media were heralding them as champions with a revolutionary new bike, stating that they looked forward to seeing them next year at the following Battle of the Twins event.
Stroud went on to win both Daytona races in 1994 on the Britten bike while setting the fastest top speed recorded by any motorcycle at Daytona (189 mph or 305 km/h). He also won the 96′,97′ and 98′ Battle of the Twins races on the mighty Britten.
But what the world realised that day is that it’s not only big corporations and factories that can produce cutting edge technology and revolutionary designs, but that the dream of one man can be used to achieve anything set before him.
A bike hand built and designed by a dyslexic Kiwi man in a Christchurch garage with over 6-7000 handmade parts, sporting technology never seen before, could compete against the best of the best, the major brand names with millions of dollars to spend on R&D, the creme de la creme.
And we not only showed that we could build the bike, we showed that we could win.
By Matt Wishart from http://nzblokes.co.nz
True sportsmanship was shown recently by promising Spanish cross-country runner Iván Fernández Anaya, 24, in race in Burlada, Navarre, Spain on December 2, 2012.

Fernández Anaya was in second place to Kenyan runner Abel Mutai, who won the bronze medal in the 3,000-meter steeplechase at the 2012 London Olympics. Mutai had an insurmountable lead in the race, but stopped before the finish believing the he’d already crossed the line. Fernández Anaya could have passed him and won the race, but realised Mutai’s mistake and instead, accepted that he was the rightful winner and helped the Kenyan over the actual finish line to victory.

This noble act of compassion, sportsmanship and honesty received almost no media attention, sadly, all sports news was focussed on Lance Armstrong’s fall from grace and subsequent confession to being a career dope cheat and liar.
Sportsmanship is not dead and the action of Fernández Anaya is a example of human compassion and everything that is positive about sport, competition and physical endeavour…a true sportsman concedes defeat graciously and then redoubles his efforts to improve. There is nothing sporting about winning unfairly.
However, Fernández Anaya’s coach, Martín Fiz, was less than impressed with his charge’s beneficent gesture, “I wouldn’t have done it myself. I certainly would have taken advantage of it to win,” He said.
Looks like Lance Armstrong may have found himself a new coach!


Man up Lance…you’re a cheat and a liar and you’ve let everyone, including yourself, down…have a look at Iván Fernández Anaya if you want a role model to guide your future.

Incredibly, insurance premiums worldwide have skyrocketed in the wake of natural disasters and the prospect of more wild weather resulting from climate change and other factors…deforestation, fracking etc, etc.
The insurance premiums for my businesses have more than doubled in the past two years and I’m one of the lucky ones…word is that the insurance for Canterbury University has increased tenfold…from $1 million to $10 million.
OK, in the case of the South Island of New Zealand, we’ve had a rough time with the Christchurch Earthquake, but insurance companies should have had sufficient reserved to cover all contingencies, have spread their own risk through reinsurance…that is what they are supposed to do…they are insurance companies and have teams of actuaries working on risk calculation to ensure the insurers are able to honour their commitment to their customers.
However, it would seem that insurance companies, which have been joined at the hip with banks for the past 50 years, are hitting their customers up for sufficient money to cover their losses in a single year…and we are allowing this to happen by dutifully digging deep and paying the inflated premiums.
In the United States the situation was even worse. U.S. citizens were subjected to the “Too Big to Fail” scenario whereby huge insurers like AIG, which completely failed to meet its commitment to its customers, was bailed out to the tune of around $180 billion by the U.S. taxpayer.
But we don’t need to worry about that here in New Zealand right? Wrong…AIG is deeply involved in the N.Z. insurance industry, it is the nation’s largest general insurer…the company even sponsors the All Blacks!

Insurance companies have a responsibility to man up and take their losses like any other business and the fact that they are being allowed to outrageously inflate their premiums to cover their losses is a failing of our government who seem feeble in response to the power of these companies and their lobbyists who argue that the government needs to support their policies…policies that the government has been backing through the legal system for many years…if you operate a commercial business, you must have insurance, it’s the law.
But of course, once the coffers of the insurers have been replenished, they will reduce the premiums right? Mmmm…that would seem unlikely given that in the history of the world insurance premiums have never gone down, so we can expect insurance companies to be making uber-profits in the coming years…the only way to get your money back would be to purchase shares in insurance companies and further encourage the bastards!!
Climate change is said to be responsible for the extreme weather conditions we have been seeing in recent years. Deforestation, pollution, industry, reliance on fossil fuels etc are seen as contributing factors to climate change, but who is behind all this? Insurance companies invest heavily in such enterprises…and fracking, which some consider responsible for earthquakes…insurance companies have it locked down…create demand for their intangible product (…you don’t need insurance until your house burns down) by destroying the Earth, sell policies to people to prevent them from personal loss resulting from “natural disasters,” have government (taxpayer) back-up in the event the demand exceeds contingency funds and then a further safety cushion by being allowed to arbitrarily increase insurance premiums whenever necessary to recover losses…and we, the policyholders and voters allow this to happen by being apathetic and subservient…we desperately need political leadership in New Zealand (and elsewhere), we the people need to stand up and say ENOUGH!! and we need political leaders who will not roll over to corporate lobbyists and stand up for the rights of the people…how about it Johnki?

![]() |
|
| Type | Public |
|---|---|
| Traded as | NYSE: AIG S&P 500 Component |
| Industry | Insurance, Financial services |
| Founded | Shanghai, China (1919)[1] |
| Founder(s) | Cornelius Vander Starr |
| Headquarters | 180 Maiden Lane, New York City, New York, United States |
| Area served | Worldwide |
| Key people | Bob Benmosche (President & CEO) Steve Miller (Chairman)[2] |
| Products | Insurance annuities, mutual funds |
| Revenue | |
| Operating income | |
| Net income | |
| Total assets | |
| Total equity | |
| Employees | 57,000 (2011)[4] |
| Website | AIG.com |
American International Group, Inc. NYSE: AIG, also known as AIG, is an American multinational insurance corporation. Its corporate headquarters is reported as 180 Maiden Lane in New York City (was formerly in the American International Building in New York City). The British headquarters office is on Fenchurch Street in London, continental Europe operations are based inLa Défense, Paris, and its Asian headquarters office is in Hong Kong. According to the 2011 Forbes Global 2000 list, AIG was the 29th-largest public company in the world.[5][6] It was listed on the Dow Jones Industrial Average from April 8, 2004 to September 22, 2008.
AIG suffered from a liquidity crisis when its credit ratings were downgraded below “AA” levels in September 2008. The United States Federal Reserve Bank on September 16, 2008 created an $85 billion credit facility to enable the company to meet increased collateral obligations consequent to the credit rating downgrade, in exchange for the issuance of a stock warrant to the Federal Reserve Bank for 79.9% of the equity of AIG. The Federal Reserve Bank and the United States Treasury by May 2009 had increased the potential financial support to AIG, with the support of an investment of as much as $70 billion, a $60 billion credit line and $52.5 billion to buy mortgage-based assets owned or guaranteed by AIG, increasing the total amount available to as much as $182.5 billion.[7][8] AIG subsequently sold a number of its subsidiaries and other assets to pay down loans received, and continues to seek buyers of its assets
|
History |
The American International Building inLower Manhattan.
AIG history dates back to 1919, when Cornelius Vander Starr established an insurance agency in Shanghai, China. Starr was the first Westerner in Shanghai to sell insurance to the Chinese, which he continued to do until AIG left China in early 1949—as Mao Zedong led the advance of the Communist People’s Liberation Army on Shanghai.[9][10] Starr then moved the company headquarters to its current home in New York City.[11] The company went on to expand, often through subsidiaries, into other markets, including other parts of Asia, Latin America, Europe, and the Middle East.[12]
In 1962, Starr gave management of the company’s lagging U.S. holdings to Maurice R. “Hank” Greenberg, who shifted its focus from personal insurance to high-margin corporate coverage. Greenberg focused on selling insurance through independent brokers rather than agents to eliminate agent salaries. Using brokers, AIG could price insurance according to its potential return even if it suffered decreased sales of certain products for great lengths of time with very little extra expense. In 1968, Starr named Greenberg his successor. The company went public in 1969.[13]
Beginning in 2005, AIG became embroiled in a series of fraud investigations conducted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, U.S. Justice Department, and New York State Attorney General‘s Office. Greenberg was ousted amid an accounting scandal in February 2005; he is still fighting civil charges being pursued by New York state.[14][15][16] The New York Attorney General’s investigation led to a $1.6 billion fine for AIG and criminal charges for some of its executives.[17] Greenberg was succeeded as CEO by Martin J. Sullivan, who had begun his career at AIG as a clerk in its London office in 1970.[18]
AIG purchased the remaining 39% that it did not own of online auto insurance specialist 21st Century Insurance in 2007 for $749 million.[19] With the failure of the parent company and the continuing recession in late 2008, AIG rebranded its insurance unit to 21st Century Insurance.[20][21]
On June 15, 2008, after disclosure of financial losses and subsequent to a falling stock price, Sullivan resigned and was replaced by Robert B. Willumstad, Chairman of the AIG Board of Directors since 2006. Willumstad was forced by the US government to step down and was replaced by Edward M. Liddy on September 17, 2008.[22] AIG’s board of directors named Robert Benmosche CEO on August 3, 2009 to replace Mr. Liddy, who earlier in the year announced his retirement.[23]
In the United States, AIG is the largest underwriter of commercial and industrial insurance, and AIG acquired American General Life Insurance in August 2001.[24]
On September 16, 2008, AIG suffered a liquidity crisis following the downgrade of its credit rating. Industry practice permits firms with the highest credit ratings to enterswaps without depositing collateral with their trading counter-parties. When its credit rating was downgraded, the company was required to post additional collateral with its trading counter-parties, and this led to an AIG liquidity crisis. AIG’s London unit sold credit protection in the form of credit default swaps (CDSs) on collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) that had by that time declined in value.[25] The United States Federal Reserve Bank announced the creation of a secured credit facility of up to US$85 billion, to prevent the company’s collapse by enabling AIG to meet its obligations to deliver additional collateral to its credit default swap trading partners. The credit facility provided a structure to loan as much as US$85 billion, secured by the stock in AIG-owned subsidiaries, in exchange for warrants for a 79.9% equity stake, and the right to suspend dividends to previously issued common and preferred stock.[18][26][27] AIG announced the same day that its board accepted the terms of the Federal Reserve Bank’s rescue package and secured credit facility.[28] This was the largest government bailout of a private company in U.S. history, though smaller than the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac a week earlier.[29][30]
AIG’s share prices had fallen over 95% to just $1.25 by September 16, 2008, from a 52-week high of $70.13.[citation needed] The company reported over $13.2 billion in losses in the first six months of the year.[31][32] The AIG Financial Products division headed by Joseph Cassano, in London, had entered into credit default swaps to insure $441 billion worth of securities originally rated AAA. Of those securities, $57.8 billion were structured debt securities backed by subprime loans.[33] CNN named Cassano as one of the “Ten Most Wanted: Culprits” of the 2008 financial collapse in the United States.[34]
As Lehman Brothers (the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history at that time) suffered a catastrophic decline in share price, investors began comparing the types of securities held by AIG and Lehman, and found that AIG had valued its Alt-A and sub-prime mortgage-backed securities at 1.7 to 2 times the values used by Lehman which weakened investors’ confidence in AIG.[31] On September 14, 2008, AIG announced it was considering selling its aircraft leasing division, International Lease Finance Corporation, to raise cash.[31] The Federal Reserve hired Morgan Stanley to determine if there are systemic risks to a financial failure of AIG, and asked private entities to supply short-term bridge loans to the company. In the meantime, New York regulators allowed AIG to borrow $20 billion from its subsidiaries.[35][36]
At the stock market‘s opening on September 16, 2008, AIG’s stock dropped 60 percent.[37] The Federal Reserve continued to meet that day with major Wall Street investment firms, hoping to broker a deal for a non-governmental $75 billion line of credit to the company.[38] Rating agencies Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s downgraded AIG’s credit ratings on concerns over likely continuing losses on mortgage-backed securities. The credit rating downgrade forced the company to deliver collateral of over $10 billion to certain creditors and CDS counter-parties.[39] The New York Times later reported that talks on Wall Street had broken down and AIG may file for bankruptcy protection on Wednesday, September 17.[40] Just before the bailout by the US Federal Reserve, AIG former CEO Maurice (Hank) Greenberg sent an impassioned letter to AIG CEO Robert B. Willumstad offering his assistance in any way possible, ccing the Board of Directors. His offer was rebuffed.[41]
On the evening of September 16, 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank‘s Board of Governors announced that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York had been authorized to create a 24-month credit-liquidity facility from which AIG could draw up to $85 billion. The loan was collateralized by the assets of AIG, including its non-regulated subsidiaries and the stock of “substantially all” of its regulated subsidiaries, and with an interest rate of 850 basis points over the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) (i.e., LIBOR plus 8.5%). In exchange for the credit facility, the U.S. government received warrants for a 79.9 percent equity stake in AIG, with the right to suspend the payment of dividends to AIG common and preferred shareholders.[18][27] The credit facility was created under the auspices of Section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act.[27][42][43] AIG’s board of directors announced approval of the loan transaction in a press release the same day. The announcement did not comment on the issuance of a warrant for 79.9% of AIG’s equity, but the AIG 8-K filing of September 18, 2008, reporting the transaction to the Securities and Exchange Commission stated that a warrant for 79.9% of AIG shares had been issued to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve.[18][28][44] AIG drew down US$ 28 billion of the credit-liquidity facility on September 17, 2008.[45] On September 22, 2008, AIG was removed from the Dow Jones Industrial Average.[46] An additional $37.8 billion credit facility was established in October. As of October 24, AIG had drawn a total of $90.3 billion from the emergency loan, of a total $122.8 billion.[47]
Maurice Greenberg, former CEO of AIG, on September 17, 2008, characterized the bailout as a nationalization of AIG. He also stated that he was “bewildered” by the situation and was at a loss over how the entire situation got out of control as it did.[48] On September 17, 2008, Federal Reserve Board chair Ben Bernanke asked Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to join him, to call on members of Congress, to describe the need for a congressionally authorized bailout of the nation’s banking system. Weeks later, Congress approved the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. Bernanke said to Paulson on September 17, “We can’t keep doing this. Both because we at the Fed don’t have the necessary resources and for reasons of democratic legitimacy, it’s important that the Congress come in and take control of the situation.”[49]
From mid September till early November, AIG’s credit-default spreads were steadily rising, implying the company was heading for default.[50][51] On November 10, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced it would purchase $40 billion in newly issued AIG senior preferred stock, under the authority of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act‘sTroubled Asset Relief Program.[52][53][54] The FRBNY announced that it would modify the September 16 secured credit facility; the Treasury investment would permit a reduction in its size from $85 billion to $60 billion, and that the FRBNY would extend the life of the facility from three to five years, and change the interest rate from 8.5% plus the three-month London interbank offered rate (LIBOR) for the total credit facility, to 3% plus LIBOR for funds drawn down, and 0.75% plus LIBOR for funds not drawn, and that AIG would create two off- balance-sheet Limited Liability Companies (LLC) to hold AIG assets: one to act as an AIG Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Facility and the second to act as an AIG Collateralized Debt Obligations Facility.[52][54] Federal officials said the $40 billion investment would ultimately permit the government to reduce the total exposure to AIG to $112 billion from $152 billion.[52] On December 15, 2008, the Thomas More Law Center filed suit to challenge the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, alleging that it unconstitutionally promotes Islamic law (Sharia) and religion. The lawsuit was filed because AIG provides Takaful Insurance Plans, which, according to the company, avoid investments and transactions that are”un-Islamic”.[55][56]
As of January 2012, TARP had about $50 billion invested in AIG according to one report. Break even for the government was figured at $28.73 a share v. then-current share price of about $25.[57]
AIG was required to post additional collateral with many creditors and counter-parties, touching off controversy when over $100 billion was paid out to major global financial institutions that had previously received TARP money. While this money was legally owed to the banks by AIG (under agreements made via credit default swaps purchased from AIG by the institutions), a number of Congressmen and media members expressed outrage that taxpayer money was going to these banks through AIG.[58] In January, 2010, a document known as “Schedule A – List of Derivative Transactions” was released to the public, against the wishes of the New York Fed. It listed many of the insurance deals that AIG had with various other parties, such as Goldman Sachs, Société Générale, Deutsche Bank, and Merrill Lynch.[59][60]
Had AIG been allowed to fail in a controlled manner through bankruptcy, bondholders and derivative counterparties (major banks) would have suffered significant losses, limiting the amount of taxpayer funds directly used. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke argued: “If a federal agency had [appropriate authority] on September 16, [2008], they could have been used to put AIG into conservatorship or receivership, unwind it slowly, protect policyholders, and impose haircuts on creditors and counterparties as appropriate. That outcome would have been far preferable to the situation we find ourselves in now.”[61]
The week following the September bailout, AIG employees and distributors participated in a California retreat which cost $444,000 and featured spa treatments, banquets, and golf outings.[62][63]
It was reported that the trip was a reward for top-performing life-insurance agents planned before the bailout.[64] Less than 24 hours after the news of the party was first reported by the media, it was reported that the Federal Reserve had agreed to give AIG an additional loan of up to $37.8 billion.[65] AP reported on October 17 that AIG executives spent $86,000 on a previously scheduled English hunting trip. News of the lavish spending came just days after AIG received an additional $37.8 billion loan from the Federal Reserve, on top of a previous $85 billion emergency loan granted the month before. Regarding the hunting trip, the company responded, “We regret that this event was not canceled.”[66] An October 30, 2008 article from CNBC reported that AIG had already drawn upon $90 billion of the $123 billion allocated for loans.[67] On November 10, 2008, just a few days before renegotiating another bailout with the US Government for $40 billion, ABC News reported that AIG spent $343,000 on a trip to a lavish resort in Phoenix, Arizona. [68]
On October 22, 2008, Lehman Brothers’ creditors who bought credit default swaps to hedge against a Lehman bankruptcy settled those accounts. The net payments were $5.2 billion[69] even though initial estimates of the amount of the settlement were between $100 billion and $400 billion.[70]
By December 2008, AIG had paid at least $18.7 billion to various financial institutions, including Goldman Sachs and Société Générale, to retire obligations related to credit default swaps (CDS). As much as $53.5 billion related to swap payouts are part of the bailout.[71]
On March 15, 2009, under mounting pressure from Congress and after consultation with the Federal Reserve, AIG disclosed a list of major recipients of collateral postings and payments under credit default swaps, guaranteed investment agreements, and securities lending agreements.[72] Below is data from one of the charts AIG released, representing only a portion of the total payouts, over a period of a few months.
| Counterparty | US $ posted | Counterparty | US $ posted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Société Générale | $4,100,000,000 | Deutsche Bank | $2,600,000,000 |
| Goldman Sachs | $2,500,000,000 | Merrill Lynch | $1,800,000,000 |
| Calyon | $1,100,000,000 | Barclays | $900,000,000 |
| UBS | $800,000,000 | DZ Bank | $700,000,000 |
| Wachovia | $700,000,000 | Rabobank | $500,000,000 |
| KFW | $500,000,000 | JPMorgan | $400,000,000 |
| Banco Santander | $300,000,000 | Danske Bank | $200,000,000 |
| Reconstruction Finance Corporation[74] | $200,000,000 | HSBC Bank | $200,000,000 |
| Morgan Stanley | $200,000,000 | Bank of America | $200,000,000 |
| Bank of Montreal | $200,000,000 | Royal Bank of Scotland | $200,000,000 |
| Other (unknown) | $4,100,000,000 |
AIG since September 2008 has marketed its assets to pay off its government loans. A global decline in the valuation of insurance businesses, and the weakening financial condition of potential bidders, has challenged its efforts. If the U.S. government decides to continue to protect the company from falling into bankruptcy, it may have to take the assets itself in exchange for the loans, or offer further direct financial support.[75]
Munich Re bought machinery and equipment insurance company Hartford Steam Boiler in 2009.[76][77]
In April 2009 it was announced that AIG was selling the 21st Century Insurance subsidiary to Farmers Insurance Group for $1.9 billion.[78] The sale included AIG Hawaii.[79]
In June 2009, AIG sold down its majority ownership of reinsurer Transatlantic Re.[80]
As of September 6, 2009, The Wall Street Journal reported that Pacific Century Group had agreed to pay $500 million for a part of American International Group’s asset management business, and that they also expected to pay an additional $200 million to AIG in carried interest and other payments linked to future performance of the business.[81]
Also in 2009, AIG sold its operations in Colombia to Ecuador’s Banco del Pichincha.
On March 1, 2010, insurance company Prudential confirmed that it was in advanced negotiations to buy the Asian operations of AIG.[82] Prudential was to buy the pan-Asian life insurance company, American International Assurance (AIA), for approximately $35.5 billion.[83] On June 1, 2010 the deal failed because AIG would not accept the $30.5 billion after Prudential lowered the amount by $5 billion from the originally planned $35.5 billion after Prudential shareholder discontent.[84]
AIG agreed on March 8, 2010, to sell its American Life Insurance Co. unit (ALICO) to MetLife Inc. for $15.5 billion in cash and stock by November 1, 2010. Alico has annuities, life and health insurance operations in Japan, Middle East (including Nepal, Bangladesh and Pakistan), Western and Eastern Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean. AIG said it will sell Alico for $6.8 billion in cash and the remainder in MetLife equity. The deal leaves AIG as the second-largest shareholder of MetLife, with a stake of more than 20% in the company.
On March 29, 2010, Bloomberg L.P. reported that after almost three months of delays, AIG had completed the $500 million sale of a portion of its asset management business, branded PineBridge Investments, to the Asia-based Pacific Century Group.[85]
In August 2010, Fortress Investment Group purchased 80% of the interest in financing company American General Finance.[86]
On September 30, 2010, AIG announced an agreement to sell two of its life insurance companies in Japan, AIG Star and AIG Edison, to Prudential Financial for $4.2 billion in cash and $600 million in the assumption of third party debt to help repay some of the money owed to the U.S. government.[87]
On November 1, 2010, AIG announced it had raised $36.71 billion from the sale of ALICO and an initial public offering for AIA (which included Philamlife). The company will use the proceeds Federal Reserve Bank of New York credit facility and make payments on other interests owned by the government.[88]
AIG announced September 6, 2012, it was selling part of its stake, up to $2 billion dollars, in Asian insurer AIA Group Ltd. and plans to pay off more of its loans from the US government. The insurer’s board also approved the repurchase of up to $5 billion dollars of shares of its common stock from the US government.[89]
On March 2, 2009, AIG reported a fourth quarter loss of $61.7bn (£43bn) and revenue of −$23.7bn (−£16.2bn) for the final three months of 2008. This was the largest quarterly loss in corporate history at that time.[90] The announcement of the loss had an impact on morning trading in Europe and Asia, with the FTSE100, DAX and Nikkeiall suffering sharp falls. In the US the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell to below 7000 points, a twelve-year low.[91][92] The news of the loss came the day after the U.S. Treasury Department had confirmed that AIG was to get an additional $30 billion in aid, on top of the $150 billion it has already received.[93] The Treasury Department suggested that the potential losses to the US and global economy would be ‘extremely high’ if it were to collapse[94] and has suggested that if in future there is no improvement, it will invest more money into the company, as it is unwilling to allow it to fail.[95] The firm’s position as not just a domestic insurer, but also one for small businesses and many listed firms, has prompted US officials to suggest its demise could be ‘disastrous’ and the Federal Reserve said that AIG posed a ‘systemic risk’ to the global economy.[90] The fourth quarter result meant the company made a $99.29 billion loss for the whole of 2008,[94] with five consecutive quarters of losses costing the company well over $100 billion.[95] In a testimony before the Senate Budget Committee on March 3, 2009, the Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke stated that “AIG exploited a huge gap in the regulatory system,” … and “to nobody’s surprise, made irresponsible bets and took huge losses”.[96]
In March 2009, AIG announced that they were paying $165 million in executive bonuses. Total bonuses for the financial unit could reach $450 million and bonuses for the entire company could reach $1.2 billion.[97] President Barack Obama, who voted for the AIG bailout as a Senator[98] responded to the planned payments by saying “[I]t’s hard to understand how derivative traders at AIG warranted any bonuses, much less $165 million in extra pay. How do they justify this outrage to the taxpayers who are keeping the company afloat?” and “In the last six months, AIG has received substantial sums from the U.S. Treasury. I’ve asked Secretary Geithner to use that leverage and pursue every legal avenue to block these bonuses and make the American taxpayers whole.”[99]
Protester outside 60 Wall StreetDeutsche Bank‘s US main office in the wake of the bonus controversy is interviewed by news media.
Politicians on both sides of the Congressional aisle reacted with outrage to the planned bonuses. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said “I would suggest the first thing that would make me feel a little bit better toward them if they’d follow the Japanese example and come before the American people and take that deep bow and say, I’m sorry, and then either do one of two things: resign or go commit suicide.”[100] Senator Chuck Schumer (D-New York) accused AIG of “Alice in Wonderland business practices” and said “It boggles the mind.” He has threatened to tax the bonuses at up to 100%.[101] Senator Richard Shelby (R-Alabama) said “These people brought this on themselves. Now you’re rewarding failure. A lot of these people should be fired, not awarded bonuses. This is horrible. It’s outrageous.”[102] Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) echoed his comments, saying “This is an outrage.”[103] Senator Jon Tester (D-Montana) said “This is ridiculous.” and AIG executives “need to understand that the only reason they even have a job is because of the taxpayers.”[104] Senator Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) said “I’ve had it.” and “The fact that they continue to do it while we pour in billions of dollars is indefensible.”[105] Representative Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts), Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said paying these bonuses would be “rewarding incompetence”[104] and “These people may have a right to their bonuses. They don’t have a right to their jobs forever.”[102]Representative Mark Kirk (R-Illinois) said “AIG should not be on welfare from Uncle Sam, and yet paying bonuses and transferring a considerable amount of taxpayer funds to entities overseas.”[105] Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said “It makes me angry. I slammed the phone more than a few times on discussing AIG.”[102] Lawrence Summers, Director of the National Economic Council, said “The easy thing would be to just say, you know, ‘Off with their heads,’ and violate the contracts, but you have to think about the consequences of breaking contracts for the overall system of law.”[106] Austan Goolsbee, of the Council of Economic Advisers said “I don’t know why they would follow a policy that’s really not sensible, is obviously going to ignite the ire of millions of people.” and “You worry about that backlash.”[107]
Political commentators and journalists expressed an equally bipartisan outrage.[100][108][109][110][110][111][112][113][114][115][116]
On March 24, 2009, The New York Times printed the resignation letter of Jake DeSantis, executive vice president of AIG’s financial products unit, to Edward M. Liddy, the chief executive of AIG. DeSantis stated he had nothing to do with the credit default swaps, he lost much of his life savings in the form of deferred compensation invested in the capital of AIG Financial Products; he had agreed to work for an annual salary of $1 out of a sense of duty, that he was assured many times the bonuses would be paid in March 2009, and that he believed he and others were let down by Liddy’s lack of support. He also stated he was going to donate his bonus to those suffering from the global economic downturn.[117]
It was reported that Senator Christopher Dodd (D-Con) (who first denied, then admitted to amending the legislation to allow the AIG bonuses), received $160,000 from employees of AIG.[118][119][120][121] A memo issued in 2006 by Joseph Cassano, AIG Financial Products chief executive, urged AIG employees to donate to Dodd, saying that as “next in line to become chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee… Senator Dodd will now have the opportunity to set the committee’s agenda on issues critical to the financial services industry.”[122]
AIG was the principal sponsor of English football club Manchester United from 2006–2010, and as part of the sponsorship deal, its logo was prominently displayed on the front of the club’s jerseys and other merchandise. The AIG deal was announced by Manchester United chief executive David Gill on April 6, 2006, for a British shirt sponsorship record £56.5 million, to be paid over four years (£14.1 million a year). The deal became the most valuable sponsorship deal in the world in September 2006, after the renegotiation and subsequent degrading of the £15 million-a-year deal Italian team Juventus had with oil firm Tamoil. During AIG’s sponsorship, Manchester United enjoyed one of its most successful periods in history, winning the Premier League three consecutive years, two Football League Cups, and the UEFA Champions League.[citation needed]
On January 21, 2009, it was announced that AIG would not be renewing its sponsorship of the club at the end of the deal in May 2010. It is not clear, however, whether or not AIG’s agreement to run MU Finance will continue. American risk consulting firm Aon Corporation was named the club’s new principal sponsor on June 3, 2009, with its sponsorship of the club taking effect from the beginning of the 2010–11 season. The terms of the deal were not revealed, but it has been reported to be worth approximately £80 million over four years.[123]
Due to the Q3 2011 net loss widened, so on November 3, 2011 the AIG shares has plunged 49 percent year to date. The insurer’s board has approved the share buyback of as much as $1 billion.[124]
|
|
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2008) |
In November 2004, AIG reached a US$126 million settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department partly resolving a number of regulatory matters, but the company must still cooperate with investigators continuing to probe the sale of a non-traditional insurance product.[125]
On June 11, 2008, three stockholders, collectively owning 4% of the outstanding stock of AIG, delivered a letter to the Board of Directors of AIG seeking to oust CEO Martin Sullivan and make certain other management and Board of Directors changes. This letter was the latest volley in what the Wall Street Journal deemed a “public spat” between the Company’s Board and management, on the one hand, and its key stockholders, and former CEO Maurice “Hank” Greenberg on the other hand.[126]
Circa 2010 the WSJ reported that a family sued AIG for alleged complicity in a ‘stranger-originated life insurance‘ scheme, whereby AIG managers allegedly welcomed people without an insurable interest to take out life insurance policies against others. The case involved JB Carlson and Germaine Tomlinson, and was one of many similar lawsuits in the US at the time.[127]
On 9 January 2013 AIG’s board discussed joining a lawsuit against the United States government because the bailout they received was unfair to their investors. [128]The idea was rejected.[129]
On October 14, 2004 the New York State Office of Attorney General Eliot Spitzer announced that it had commenced a civil action against Marsh & McLennan Companiesfor steering clients to preferred insurers with whom the company maintained lucrative payoff agreements, and for soliciting rigged bids for insurance contracts from the insurers. The Attorney General announced in a release that two AIG executives pleaded guilty to criminal charges in connection with this illegal course of conduct. In early May 2005, AIG restated its financial position and issued a reduction in book value of USD $2.7 billion, a 3.3 percent reduction in net worth.
On February 9, 2006, AIG and the New York State Attorney General’s office agreed to a settlement in which AIG would pay a fine of $1.6 billion.[130]
As of October 2011.[131]
| Wikimedia Commons has media related to: American International Group |
Our daughter Diva loves the BaBear game we invented…we hide BaBear around the house and she hunts him down and brings him back to us….we’re basically training her to be a hunter and gatherer.
Diva is really very good at this game and we are running out of hiding places for BaBear…perhaps we’ll take him on holiday…or start hiding him in the garden as the summer weather is so nice here in Sunny Karamea…here are some photos of the BaBear game…I guess we could put Diva in front of the TV to keep her entertained…but where’s the fun in that?



















































Japanese artist Shota Kawahara made his American debut recently with his first art exhibition titled “Inspiration,” which will run at the Lake Forest art gallery and retail shop Re-Invent until Sept. 29.
Shota’s journey to Lake Forest started when he met Re-Invent co-owner and Lake Forest High School graduate Kristin Mikrut while they were both resident artists at the Living in Peace Project in Karamea located on the West Coast of the South Island of New Zealand.
Mikrut returned to Lake Forest and opened Re-Invent in May 2012 with childhood friend and Lake Forest Academy graduate Cecilia Lanyon. Familiar with the depth of Shota’s diverse talent, Mikrut and Lanyon asked him to showcase his work in their hometown and to be Re-Invent’s first resident artist.
“My whole idea of being artist is to inspire people,” Shota said. “Not only by my art works but also by my way of living, traveling, sharing experience and passion.”
More than 10 volunteers from the Lake Forest community helped Shota prepare for his exhibition, which in addition to his “abstract landscape” paintings, features collaboration work with gallery co-owners Kristin and Cecilia and a video about the Living in Peace Project.
A portion of the proceeds from “Inspiration” also will benefit the Lake Forest-Lake Bluff Rotary Club’s fundraising outreach for Rotary International tsunami relief efforts.
Before arriving in the United States, Kawahara traveled the world for the past seven years to find inspiration, experience and knowledge for his art. He also is a graduate of the Kyoto University art faculty.
On his website, Shota attributed nature as his biggest inspiration for his “abstract landscape style.”
Shota described the paintings as “vibrant, intense, highly worked in colorful detail, unique and uplifting.” The paintings featured over 30 individual colors with immense details and layers of complex composition masked by simple shapes meant to stimulate imagination, bring out one’s inner creativity and subconscious.
According to Shota, “Each shape is quite simple, but there are layers of complex composition and detail. That’s why people never quite understand the whole painting. Each time when people look at it they find different shapes and stories.”
For him, “art is a means of visualizing one’s philosophy.” Like the exhibition’s name, Shota hopes his art will “inspire people to open their mind and heart.”
To learn more about “Inspiration” visit www.shotakawahara.com, or check it out in person at Re-Invent, 202 Wisconsin Ave, Lake Forest, IL.
By Paige Wagenknecht, GazeboNews assistant editor
“We’re all scared,” said Paul Ehrlich, president of the Center for Conservation Biology at Stanford University.
“But we must tell the truth about what’s happening and challenge people to do something to prevent it,” Ehrlich told IPS.
Global collapse of human civilisation seems likely, write Ehrlich and his partner Anne Ehrlich in the prestigious science journal, Proceedings of the Royal Society.
This collapse will take the form of a “…gradual breakdown because famines, epidemics and resource shortages cause a disintegration of central control within nations, in concert with disruptions of trade and conflicts over increasingly scarce necessities”, they write.
Already two billion people are hungry today. Food production is humanity’s biggest industry and is already being affected by climate and other environmental problems. “No civilisation can avoid collapse if it fails to feed its population,” the authors say.
Escalating climate disruption, ocean acidification, oceanic dead zones, depletion of groundwater and extinctions of plants and animals are the main drivers of the coming collapse, they write in their peer-reviewed article “Can a collapse of global civilisation be avoided?” published this week.
Dozens of earth systems experts were consulted in writing the 10-page paper that contains over 160 references.
“We talked to many of the world’s leading experts to reflect what is really happening,” said Ehrlich, who is an eminent biologist and winner of many scientific awards.
Our reality is that current overconsumption of natural resources and the resulting damage to life-sustaining services nature provides means we need another half of a planet to keeping going. And that’s if all seven billion remain at their current living standards, the Ehrlichs write.
If everyone lived like a U.S. citizen, another four or five planets would be needed.

Global population is projected to increase by 2.5 billion by 2050. It doesn’t take an expert to conclude that collapse of civilisation will be unavoidable without major changes.
We’re facing a future where billions will likely die, and yet little is being done to avoid certain disaster, he said.
“Policy makers and the public aren’t terrified about this because they don’t have the information or the knowledge about how our planet functions,” he said.
Last March, the world’s scientific community provided the first-ever “state of the planet” assessment at the “Planet Under Pressure” conference in London. More than 3,000 experts concluded humanity is facing a “planetary emergency” and there was no time to lose in making large-scale changes.
In 2010, a coalition of the national scientific bodies and international scientific unions from 141 countries warned that “the continued functioning of the Earth system as we know it is at risk”.
“The situation is absolutely desperate and yet there’s nothing on the front pages or on the agenda of world leaders,” said Pat Mooney, head of the international environmental organisation ETC Group.
“The lack of attention is a tragedy,” Mooney previously told IPS.
Solutions exist and are briefly outlined in the Ehrlich paper. However, these require sweeping changes. All nations need to do everything they can to reduce their emissions of fossil fuels regardless of actions or lack of them by any other country, he said.
Protection of the Earth’s biodiversity must take centre stage in all policy and economic decisions. Water and energy systems must be re-engineered. Agriculture must shift from fossil-fuel intensive industrial monocultures to ecologically-based systems of food production. Resilience and flexibility will be essential for civilisation to survive.
A key element in meeting this unprecedented challenge is “…to see ourselves as utterly embedded in Nature and not somehow separate from those precious systems that sustain all life”, writes England’s Prince Charles commenting on the Ehrlich’s paper.
“To continue with ‘business as usual’ is an act of suicide on a gargantuan scale,” Prince Charles concluded from his holiday castle over a dinner of swan.


Karamea Ministry of Red Tape # 18
Office Manager: Red Scarlett
Red Scarlett
Senior Complaints Officer: Madagascar Mirage
Madagascar Mirage
Office Receptionist: Sizzle Voluptuous
Sizzle Voluptuous
Tea Lady: Marjoram Eucalyptus
Marjoram Eucalyptus
Office Wombat: Gangamania
Karamea Ministry of Red Tape Office, Market Cross 9 a.m.
Zorcon Kalaska: Excuse me…..
Sizzle Voluptuous: Sorry the Karamea Ministry of Red Tape is closed for the Melbourne Cup.
Zorcon Kalaska: But but the Melbourne Cup isn’t until the first Tuesday in November!
Madagascar Mirage: Are you questioning this young brunette bimbo’s intelligence? Come back tomorrow!!
Zorcon Kalaska: What are the business hours for the Karamea Ministry of Red Tape??
Madagscar Mirage: 9 am to 5 pm no exceptions!
Zorcon Kalaska: I have a platinum card with a $50,000 credit limit, can’t I offer you a bribe to accept my complaint now!
Madagscar Mirage: The Karamea Ministry of Red Tape does not accept bribes but we do allow anonymous generous donations of large amounts of cash in small unmarked bills.
Zorcon Kalaska: Name your price!
Madagscar Mirage: Fees are by negotiation!
Zorcon Kalaska: Look in my briefcase $20,000 in $100 notes.
Madagscar Mirage: I will have to consult my superior officer Red Scarlett.
Red Scarlett: Mmmm $100 notes. Wait until I get my gloves on. Don’t want to leave my fingerprints on the loot… I mean commission!
Madagscar Mirage: The Karamea Ministry of Red Tape is now officially open for business!
Red Scarlett: I will be in my office ringing my travel agent!
Zorcon Kalaska: Holidaying somewhere?
Red Scarlett: Hawaii!! Surf’s up!
Madagscar Mirage: Please state the nature of your complaint!
Zorcon Kalaska: I want to make a complaint about bureaucratic corruption.
Madagscar Mirage: An official complaint squire?
Zorcon Kalaska: Yes indeed!!!
Madagscar Mirage: The exact nature of your complaint?
Zorcon Kalaska : The hypocrisy of Government Departmental officials taking bribes, stealing from the public fund, employing thieves, vagabonds and pickpockets and not paying tax on their ill gotten gains!!
Madagscar Mirage: Atrocious!!! You’ve come to the right administrative office to make such a complaint!
Zorcon Kalaska: No!!! My wallet, my watch gone! Stolen!
Madagscar Mirage: What about your lucky cloverleaf cufflinks?
Zorcon Kalaska: Wow, you must be psychic!! Disappeared!!!
Madagscar Mirage: And your Schaeffer limited edition gold plated ball point pen?
Zorcon Kalaska: Incredible! No longer in my jacket!!!
Madagscar Mirage: Mmmm! Not your lucky day!!!
Zorcon Kalaska: The Karamea Triangle! Will you record my complaint???
Madagscar Mirage: Yes indeed corruption is to be frowned upon!!!
Zorcon Kalaska: Do I get a receipt for my money?
Madagscar Mirage: Official Karamea Ministry of Red tape policy does not allow for receipts but you do qualify for a Hi-5!
Zorcon Kalaska: Where do I sign?
Madagscar Mirage: Here where I marked X!
Z..o..r..c..o..n………
Kaboom!!!
Red Scarlett: He’s still alive!! Zorcon I thought you were a crack shot!
Zorcon Kalaska: Argle…argle….
Marjoram Eucalyptus: Cup of tea???????
Zorcon Kalaska: Argle..argle..
Red Scarlett: You shot off his left nostril!!!
Madagscar Mirage: Hey come back!! He’s getting away! Prick!
Sizzle Volutpuous: Boo hoo!! I wanted his eyeballs for my poor old blind grandmother!
Zorcon Kalaska: Never mind let me give you cuddle!
SLAP!!!!!!!!!
Sizzle Voluptuous: That wasn’t a cuddle that was a groper!
Red Scarlett: Look sharp here comes Sergeant Paddy Locks!!!
Sergeant Paddy Locks: Top of the morning to you. I heard a gunshot and saw a fellow in the street bleeding.
Red Scarlett: Mmmmm! This watch would look perfect on your arm!
Sergeant Paddy Locks: Ta!
Madagscar Mirage: Gold plated lucky cloverleaf cuff links??
Sergeant Paddy Locks: My lucky day!!! Now about that shooting!!!
Red Scarlett: The Melbourne Cup is on today. Can’t this wait until next year?
Sergeant Paddy Locks: Well I suppose!
Red Scarlett: Excellent!!
Sergeant Paddy Locks: Begorrrrah!!! My new watch, it’s disappeared!
Gangamania: Arf arf!!
Rate this: